Titlebook: Interpretation as Pragmatics; Jean-Jacques Lecercle Book 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1999 interact

Glitch

书目名称Interpretation as Pragmatics影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Interpretation as Pragmatics影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Interpretation as Pragmatics网络公开度




书目名称Interpretation as Pragmatics网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Interpretation as Pragmatics被引频次




书目名称Interpretation as Pragmatics被引频次学科排名




书目名称Interpretation as Pragmatics年度引用




书目名称Interpretation as Pragmatics年度引用学科排名




书目名称Interpretation as Pragmatics读者反馈




书目名称Interpretation as Pragmatics读者反馈学科排名

碎石

2947-0188 the resources of pragmatics, literary theory and the philosophy of language to propose a new theory of literary, but also of face-to-face, dialogue that charts the interaction between the five participants in the fields of dialogue and/or interpretation: author, reader, text, language and encyclopa

品牌

Pragmatics of Interpretation, the rudiments of literary interpretation — to indulge in the practice, and to revel in the achievement (for the term, like many nouns derived from verbs, ‘representation’ for instance, is ambiguous between process and result).

acetylcholine

Let Him Have It, Chris, the same thing as dialogue — will appear only too soon. But the starting-point of the argument is what linguists call the ‘situation of communication’. The classic model for this is to be found in Jakobson’s famous essay, ‘Linguistics and Poetics’.. It involves six elements, or participants:

Optic-Disk

轻触

The Reader, or: Imposture,ve already sketched, are to be found in intertext, in tradition, in the mutual beliefs that foster convention, in all that goes under the name of encyclopaedia. Proliferation there is, but within strict limits: midrash is tolerant, but not unto Ettleson.

发起

Encyclopaedia, or: the Pragmatics of Literature,t denotes a body of belief, which is its original meaning in the works of the French . and the banal meaning it still has in contemporary sociology — Althusser’s ‘system of representations’ (in .) belongs to this acceptation.

Aura231

Alter Ego,ime being at least. The concept of actor, therefore, according to tradition, ascribes a privileged place to author and reader according to the analogy between speech act and interpretation that informs my guiding metaphor. To take this privileged position into account, we might be tempted to modify the initial diagram to a slight extent:

Brain-Imaging

The Author, or: Intention,le’ (vague) intend (with qualifications about recognition) to effect by .’.. The introduction of distributive, or cooperative, or perhaps even collective ‘intentions’ takes us a long way from Hirsch’s clear, if misguided, concept of authorial will-to-say as guarantee of the text’s meaning and of the correctness of interpretation.

Synchronism