Titlebook: International Perspectives on the Yugoslav Conflict; Alex Danchev (Professor of International Relations Book 1996 Palgrave Macmillan, a di

HUSH

神圣将军

American Perspectives,demonstrate a hesitant, limited commitment to resolving the worst conflict in Europe since the Second World War? Moral indignation and exhortations to ‘do something’ which might stop the humanitarian, political and military disaster of the former Yugoslavia often obscure the search for an answer. Th

semiskilled

nugatory

German Perspectives,apable of responding adequately to the security challenges of the post-Cold War era, more radical voices accused Germany of trying to dominate Europe. The thesis of this chapter is that the German approach to the Yugoslav crisis was influenced by:

毛细血管

French Perspectives,e accused of inactivity or indifference, as the French . are on the front line and 22 of them have already been killed in action (at the time of writing). Paris was the active instigator of humanitarian aid; and President Francois Mitterrand made a foray into Sarajevo in June 1992 and opened up the

不法行为

British Perspectives,es, from different quarters. Allegations were levelled that British policy was pro-Serbian, that it was a policy of appeasement and a policy of indifference. And yet, whilst British policy was less than glorious, and in the end, a failure, it shared those qualities with other major actors in the int