找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Trust; Towards Theoretical Ellie Shockley,Tess M.S. Neal,Brian H. Bornstein Book 2016 Springer Internati

[复制链接]
楼主: Blandishment
发表于 2025-3-23 11:08:15 | 显示全部楼层
Examining the Relationship Between Interpersonal and Institutional Trust in Political and Health Cace one another remain unclear. We define trust as the willingness to be vulnerable to another party, and focus our discussion on situations where the trustor (trusting party) is an individual member of the public and the trustee (party being trusted) is an institution or one of its members. We revie
发表于 2025-3-23 16:58:48 | 显示全部楼层
Trust as a Multilevel Phenomenon Across Contexts: Implications for Improved Interdisciplinarity in tal studies, management and industrial organization, psychology, political science, and sociology. Cross-disciplinary approaches to the study of trust, however, have been limited by differences in defining and measuring trust and in methodological approaches. In this chapter, we take the position th
发表于 2025-3-23 18:32:18 | 显示全部楼层
On the Cross-Domain Scholarship of Trust in the Institutional Context,ins. These efforts typically seek to leverage the best available science for understanding and motivating trust but it is, as yet, not well understood to what degree trust is essentially the same or importantly different across the various domains. Trust building efforts are, therefore, often left w
发表于 2025-3-24 01:42:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 04:21:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 07:02:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 10:46:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 16:35:01 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2016ur understanding of institutional trust. Citing, among other things, current breakdowns of trust in prominent institutions, the book presents a multilevel model identifying universal aspects of trust as well as domain- and context-specific variations deserving further study. Contributors analyze sim
发表于 2025-3-24 20:50:42 | 显示全部楼层
stice, psychology, law, economics, healthcare, sociology, pu. This timely collection explores trust research from many angles while ably demonstrating the potential of cross-discipline collaboration to deepen our understanding of institutional trust. Citing, among other things, current breakdowns of
发表于 2025-3-25 03:13:49 | 显示全部楼层
Who Do You Trust?,n, do they trust? Is trust something that can be molded over time, or does it remain relatively stable? And lastly, are institutional trust and generalized trust a part of the same syndrome; what determines institutional trust?
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-5 03:07
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表