Titlebook: Interculturality in Education; A Theoretical and Me Fred Dervin Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Migration.Di

粘上

书目名称Interculturality in Education影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Interculturality in Education影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Interculturality in Education网络公开度




书目名称Interculturality in Education网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Interculturality in Education被引频次




书目名称Interculturality in Education被引频次学科排名




书目名称Interculturality in Education年度引用




书目名称Interculturality in Education年度引用学科排名




书目名称Interculturality in Education读者反馈




书目名称Interculturality in Education读者反馈学科排名

Inveterate

Misnomers,, identity, and collectivity. The concept of culture has always been central in research and practice of interculturality. Yet culture has been questioned in many other fields of research for being too solid and generalizing. A fluid approach to it is proposed. In a similar vein, the idea of identit

Jargon

Imaginaries About Interculturality,s—or myths—about interculturality. He discusses the myths related to the concepts of globalization, diversity, origins, ‘the same’, and the ‘local’. Deeply engrained in official practice and research discourses on interculturality, these imaginaries deserve to be defused and replaced with alternativ

mechanism

返老还童

,Interculturality and the ‘Fragilities’ of Human Rights,centric approach to human rights. Some supranational initiatives are critiqued for being ‘fragile’ and for positioning ‘us’ and ‘them’ in relation to human rights. Counterhegemonic ways that go counter to such approaches are discussed in the field of education to conclude the chapter.

Thymus

convert

ALIAS

cloture

后退

Misnomers,y, a central concept of our times, is very important for interculturality. The author argues that it needs to be examined from a co-constructivist position. Finally, the concept of collectivity is redefined in relation to postmodern interculturality.