Titlebook: Intercultural Communication and Science and Technology Studies; Luis Reyes-Galindo,Tiago Ribeiro Duarte Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applic

入伍仪式

From , to ,: Art and Metaphor in the Communication of Psychiatric Genetics to Publicsent programme that emerged from an internationally renowned psychiatric genetics centre, we propose the concept of the .. .. to consider how an exchange of viewpoints between groups of people—including psychiatric geneticists and lay publics—who are often uneasy in one another’s company can be facil

在前面

opprobrious

Introduction: Intercultural Communication and Science and Technology Studies,ise, and boundary objects. We argue that communities interested in the study of intercultural communication would benefit from dialoguing with STS as this field has much to contribute to debates over this phenomenon. We also summarise the chapters that compose this book.

诱拐

斗争

mitral-valve

Communication in International Technical Cooperation: An Anthropological Systems Approachcally following one conceptual object—the ., or cotton-producing peasant—as it both connects and disconnects scales in the project, this analysis brings to the fore the double issue of multi-scalarity and self-reference, which becomes central when one views communication in a cybernetic rather than semiotic sense.

progestin

Book 2017mmunication related to science and technology, as well as rich case studies that illustrate the challenges and strategies deployed in these situations. Individual studies explore Europe, Latin America, and Africa, thus including diverse Global North and South contexts.

组装

Book 2017rs discuss interactions between different scientific communities; scientists and policy-makers; science and the public; scientists and artists; and other situations where science clashes with other socio-cultural domains. The volume includes theoretical proposals of how to deal with intercultural co

CAMP

Mutual Linguistic Socialisation in Interdisciplinary Collaborationnot result in individuals acquiring a high level of linguistic competence in the domain that is not their own, namely interactional expertise (IE). Yet these efforts can help to bridge communicative gaps between paleoclimatologists and paleo-modellers.

Evacuate

From “Climate Sceptic” to “Dendro-Sociologist”: Considering the Role of Trust in the Communication ogists and STS knowledge. What emerges from my account is, therefore, an optimistic message for STS scholars regarding the role of trust in communicating science in action; to be sure, having trust bonds with our immediate scientific audiences does not generate immediate and complete communication but it cultivates greater tolerance and mutuality.