找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice; Axel Gosseries,Alain Marciano,Alain Strowel Book 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Mac

[复制链接]
查看: 24042|回复: 56
发表于 2025-3-21 17:32:22 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice
编辑Axel Gosseries,Alain Marciano,Alain Strowel
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice;  Axel Gosseries,Alain Marciano,Alain Strowel Book 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Mac
描述Fourteen philosophers, economists and legal scholars address the question ‘Can intellectual property rights be fair?‘ What differentiates intellectual from real property? Should libertarians or Rawlsians defend IP rights? What‘s wrong with free-riding? How can incentives be taken into account by theories of justice?
出版日期Book 2008
关键词ethics; intellectual property; IP; John Locke; John Rawls; philosophy; social justice
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-58239-2
isbn_softcover978-0-230-28502-6
isbn_ebook978-0-230-58239-2
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2008
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice网络公开度




书目名称Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice被引频次




书目名称Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice被引频次学科排名




书目名称Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice年度引用




书目名称Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice年度引用学科排名




书目名称Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice读者反馈




书目名称Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:01:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:36:17 | 显示全部楼层
http://image.papertrans.cn/i/image/469226.jpg
发表于 2025-3-22 05:36:04 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2008Fourteen philosophers, economists and legal scholars address the question ‘Can intellectual property rights be fair?‘ What differentiates intellectual from real property? Should libertarians or Rawlsians defend IP rights? What‘s wrong with free-riding? How can incentives be taken into account by theories of justice?
发表于 2025-3-22 10:36:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:38:37 | 显示全部楼层
Access to vs. Exclusion from Knowledge: Intellectual Property, Efficiency and Social JusticeProperty rights have been a powerful device for promoting trade development, markets and efficiency throughout human history. What is not owned cannot be traded. Hence, a well-defined set of property rights is central to trade.
发表于 2025-3-22 19:11:26 | 显示全部楼层
Access to vs. Exclusion from Knowledge: Intellectual Property, Efficiency and Social JusticeProperty rights have been a powerful device for promoting trade development, markets and efficiency throughout human history. What is not owned cannot be traded. Hence, a well-defined set of property rights is central to trade.
发表于 2025-3-22 22:35:11 | 显示全部楼层
pfes mit einem theoretischen Abschnitt zu beschließen. Indes: Es gibt eine Zeit der praktischen Arbeit und eine Zeit der Theorie. . Leider konnten bei unserer Darstellung eine Reihe praktisch wichtiger aber noch ungeklärter Fragen keine Berücksichtigung finden. Wir nennen hier nur die Frage über die
发表于 2025-3-23 03:30:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:55:19 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-11 14:13
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表