Titlebook: Inside Plea Bargaining; The Language of Nego Douglas W. Maynard Book 1984 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1984 Frame.discourse.mod

厚脸皮

eral picture of the process as a way to assess its degree of justness have neglected the specific skills by which prac­ titioners bargain and negotiate, the particular procedures through which various surface features such as character assessment are accomplished, and concrete ways in which justice is adminis978-1-4899-0374-7978-1-4899-0372-3

faddish

Douglas W. Maynarder of key factors, including the active integration of employees, customer-oriented development, the reduction of complexity in products and processes, and controlling of innovation in terms of978-3-540-89514-5

侵略者

IRATE

打算

Descriptions and Assessments of Defendants,ake strong adversary stances, they do consider background factors not legally relevant to the question of whether the defendant is guilty as charged (cf. Newman, 1966: 114–130), including the person’s age, mentality, respectability, and so on.

lambaste

Gastric

Modeling Sentencing Decisions,ge, race, socioeconomic status, sex, or other “extralegal” attributes. Largely, studies addressing this question in the last three decades examined the influence of various . and .. factors . imposed sentences, rather than investigating the . by which various dispositional outcomes are produced..

雄辩

燕麦

Routine and Adversarial Justice,tinuances, and trials for misdemeanor cases. Systematic procedures for leading into, elaborating, and exiting from the sequence relate it to other components of negotiation, such as discussion, argument, justification, counterproposing, third-party participation, and so on.

Lacunar-Stroke

Book 1984 actual discourse activity, occurring between people who have substantial interests and tasks in the real social world, is in its infancy. This is the more surprising because plea bargaining, as a specific form of negotiation, has recently been the center of an enormous amount of research attention.