找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Innovations for our Future; Delphi ’98: New Fore Kerstin Cuhls,Knut Blind,Hariolf Grupp Book 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002 Te

[复制链接]
查看: 7256|回复: 43
发表于 2025-3-21 18:24:26 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Innovations for our Future
副标题Delphi ’98: New Fore
编辑Kerstin Cuhls,Knut Blind,Hariolf Grupp
视频video
丛书名称Technology, Innovation and Policy (ISI)
图书封面Titlebook: Innovations for our Future; Delphi ’98: New Fore Kerstin Cuhls,Knut Blind,Hariolf Grupp Book 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002 Te
描述Foresight has experienced a great upswing in the last few years, partly in view of the Millenium. .Innovations for. .our. .Future. describes not only the big development trends of the future in research and technology, but also the re-discovery of the Delphi method. The Delphi method is not new, but with further developed methodology it is being used increasingly to take stock of innovative future developments. The book describes results of the widespread national survey of 1998, a German-Japanese comparison, another comparison with the preceding Delphi study as well as its utilization and implementation.
出版日期Book 2002
关键词Technologie; chemistry; development; environment; history; innovation; innovations; management; organization
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57472-6
isbn_softcover978-3-7908-1434-7
isbn_ebook978-3-642-57472-6Series ISSN 1431-9667
issn_series 1431-9667
copyrightSpringer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Innovations for our Future影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Innovations for our Future影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Innovations for our Future网络公开度




书目名称Innovations for our Future网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Innovations for our Future被引频次




书目名称Innovations for our Future被引频次学科排名




书目名称Innovations for our Future年度引用




书目名称Innovations for our Future年度引用学科排名




书目名称Innovations for our Future读者反馈




书目名称Innovations for our Future读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

1票 100.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:46:08 | 显示全部楼层
The Subject Areas,articularly clear-cut relationships or subjects which have received special comments from the Delphi experts. This should invite you to identify your own key topics and to set them within your own personal frame of reference.
发表于 2025-3-22 01:40:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:08:58 | 显示全部楼层
German-Japanese Comparison,ing, leadership in research and development is essentially the same in the Japanese and German assessment, but on the other hand, the experts of both countries each consider themselves further advanced than their colleagues in the other country.
发表于 2025-3-22 12:26:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:44:57 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2002 with further developed methodology it is being used increasingly to take stock of innovative future developments. The book describes results of the widespread national survey of 1998, a German-Japanese comparison, another comparison with the preceding Delphi study as well as its utilization and implementation.
发表于 2025-3-22 18:37:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 21:31:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:45:09 | 显示全部楼层
History and Basic Methods,ers themselves whose opinions are desired. Perhaps personal predicting lies behind this or serves primarily one’s own interests rather than general predictions of the future. This is something we shall see in the future. But can the researchers who work on projects all be wrong?
发表于 2025-3-23 08:38:05 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-25 23:30
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表