找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics; For the Good of the Grzegorz Mazur, O.P. Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Medi

[复制链接]
查看: 36403|回复: 50
发表于 2025-3-21 16:52:19 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics
副标题For the Good of the
编辑Grzegorz Mazur, O.P.
视频video
概述Offers a deeper and broader understanding of informed consent and proxy consent from the perspective of Christian ethics.Assists those in the medical field understand and critically evaluate certain r
丛书名称Philosophy and Medicine
图书封面Titlebook: Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics; For the Good of the  Grzegorz Mazur, O.P. Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Medi
描述This work offers a comprehensive understanding rooted in Catholic anthropology and moral theory of the meaning and limits of informed and proxy consent to experimentation on human subjects. In particular, it seeks to articulate the rationale for proxy consent in both therapeutic and nontherapeutic settings. As to the former, the book proposes that the Golden Rule, recognizing the basic inclinations of human nature toward objective goods perfective of human persons, should underpin the notion of proxy consent to experimentation on humans. As to the latter, an additional scrutiny of the amount of risk involved is necessary, since the risk-benefit ratio frequently invoked to justify higher-risk therapeutic research does not exist in its nontherapeutic counterpart. This study discusses a number of possible solutions to this question and develops a position that builds upon the objective notion of the human good.
出版日期Book 2012
关键词Golden Rule; Informed consent; Proxy consent; Research on human subjects; The Subject‘s Good
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2196-8
isbn_softcover978-94-007-3715-0
isbn_ebook978-94-007-2196-8Series ISSN 0376-7418 Series E-ISSN 2215-0080
issn_series 0376-7418
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics网络公开度




书目名称Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics被引频次




书目名称Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics被引频次学科排名




书目名称Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics年度引用




书目名称Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics年度引用学科排名




书目名称Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics读者反馈




书目名称Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:37:33 | 显示全部楼层
The Historical Development of the Principle of Free and Informed Consent,e law, with some subsequent statutory modifications” whereas the former “has been shaped by professional codes, statutes, and administrative regulations with the courts playing a less important role” (Berg et al. 2001, 249; see also Beauchamp and Faden 2004, 1274).
发表于 2025-3-22 03:16:57 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:37:32 | 显示全部楼层
Critique of Proxy Consent Standards,ocus on its anthropological and ethical consequences. Third, I will show that autonomy, construed as pure self-determination, underlies not only SJS and PAS, as typically proposed, but also BIS, as a result of autonomy’s decisive impact on the way the notion of good, undergirding the patient’s or research subject’s best interests, is perceived.
发表于 2025-3-22 10:45:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:14:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:57:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:34:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:22:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:24:04 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-16 01:40
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表