Titlebook: Induction, Physics and Ethics; Proceedings and Disc Paul Weingartner,Gerhard Zecha Conference proceedings 1970 D. Reidel Publishing Company

gloomy

书目名称Induction, Physics and Ethics影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Induction, Physics and Ethics影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Induction, Physics and Ethics网络公开度




书目名称Induction, Physics and Ethics网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Induction, Physics and Ethics被引频次




书目名称Induction, Physics and Ethics被引频次学科排名




书目名称Induction, Physics and Ethics年度引用




书目名称Induction, Physics and Ethics年度引用学科排名




书目名称Induction, Physics and Ethics读者反馈




书目名称Induction, Physics and Ethics读者反馈学科排名

小争吵

隐语

Comments on ‘Linguistically Invariant Inductive Logic’ by Ian Hackingt is well known that in Carnap’s theory confirmation measures are sensitive to the way in which families of predicates are generated out of sets of ‘primitive’ predicates partitioning these families. Hacking indicates agreement with Wesley Salmon that such sensitivity is objectionable. Unlike Salmon

顶点

爱花花儿愤怒

Statistics, Induction, and Lawlikeness: Comments on Dr. Vetter’s Paper he touches on within the confines of my comment. I must therefore limit my remarks to a few selected topics. Among the wealth of material offered by Dr. Vetter’s paper I have chosen two subjects for special consideration. They are (1) the relevance of mathematical statistics to a logician’s work on

Creditee

Simultaneity by Slow Clock Transport in the Special Theory of Relativityd in its bearing on the philosophical status of simultaneity in the Special Theory of Relativity (STR). Critical attention is focused on the claim, made in a 1967 paper by B. Ellis and P. Bowman (E & B), that Bridgman’s alternative to Einstein’s clock synchronization rule refutes the philosophical c

BRAND

欢乐东方

联合

pacific