Titlebook: In the Name of the Nation; Nationalism and Poli Marlène Laruelle Book 2009 Marlène Laruelle 2009 communism.immigration.migration.nationalis

Maximizer

Book 2009e seen as a phenomenon confined to the margins of society. This study rejects the interpretation that understands Kremlin-backed patriotism as simply part of a fascist trend in Russia and as a rapprochement between the political authorities and the extreme right. A simplistic analysis of such a para

多节

Nationalism as Conservative Centrism: United Russia,ulist parliamentary parties of it. If the latter continue to lay claim to the right to express the needs and concerns of the nation, they have many difficulties in making their voices heard and are largely stifled by the patriotic slogans put forth by the Kremlin.

Dislocation

事情

EXPEL

Introduction,onomy. The image was one of Mafioso businessmen and oligarchs getting rich at the expense of a society that was wracked by misery, undermined by corruption, prostitution, and drug abuse, and that had abandoned its children and elderly persons. In the first decade of the twenty-first century Russia’s

放肆的你

吗啡

Nationalism as Opposition: The Extra-parliamentary Camp,ght, extremism, and so forth, can be more rigorously defined as extra-parliamentary. All attempts to classify these nationalist movements according to doctrine seem to me to be doomed to failure. While it is possible to specify the singularity of each movement through its unique combination of ideol

柳树；枯黄

Nationalism as Populism: The Protestation Parties,esent themselves as part of the opposition but participate in the legislative game and sit at the Duma. There are three such parties: the Communist Party, Vladimir Zhirinovski’s LDPR, and the Rodina formation, the latter having been partially replaced by Fair Russia. I define their nationalism as po

FAR

Nationalism as Conservative Centrism: United Russia,some years, been in the hands of the opposition. In the second half of the 1990s, the ruling elites began to invest in this field of discourse and, in the following decade, succeeded in virtually monopolizing references to the nation, dispossessing both the extra-parliamentary opposition and the pop

octogenarian