Titlebook: Imagination and Principles; An Essay on the Role Mark Coeckelbergh Book 2007 Mark Coeckelbergh 2007 absolutism.bibliography.care.culture.im

瘦削

书目名称Imagination and Principles影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Imagination and Principles影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Imagination and Principles网络公开度




书目名称Imagination and Principles网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Imagination and Principles被引频次




书目名称Imagination and Principles被引频次学科排名




书目名称Imagination and Principles年度引用




书目名称Imagination and Principles年度引用学科排名




书目名称Imagination and Principles读者反馈




书目名称Imagination and Principles读者反馈学科排名

密切关系

Limits their role as constraints, and the difficulty of combining impartiality and empathy. My criticism of Nussbaum culminates in the development of an account of cosmopolitanism at the end of this chapter and in Chapter 9.

Hyperlipidemia

Kant and Kantiansse their importance in moral reasoning and their role as constraints as well as guides. Rather than seeing imagination and principles in terms of competition metaphors and centre-periphery schemas, I understand both as cooperative and equally necessary in moral reasoning.

儿童

Compass

Limitsrole for imagination to be fully intelligible. Nevertheless there remain serious problems with these theories. In this chapter, I will further discuss these problems and explore possibilities for reconciling the moral sentiment approach with the Kantian-universalist approach.

羊栏

Cosmopolitanismation and principles. In particular, my discussion of cosmopolitanism will allow me to further argue for the possibility and necessity of an approach to moral theory that combines imagination and principles in a way that gives both equally important and necessary role and shows that and how they depend upon one another.

愉快么

Mass Media and Digital Cultureh to global suffering mediated by television. I will focus in particular on terrorism. In the next section, I will ask the question if and how violent videogames can stimulate empathy. My discussion will benefit from the insights gained in the previous chapters.

thrombosis

Conclusions? In this book, I have formulated an incomplete but more comprehensive answer to these questions by examining three traditions in moral theory — including their interactions with each other and with problems in moral practice.

Pillory

Introduction the imagination of a genius, and of imaginative novels, paintings, and works of music. But what about morality? The claim that imagination can and should play a role in moral reasoning may raise eyebrows. Imagination and the artistic context in which it is believed to have its home, suggest a freed

FILLY

Limitsng. There are various limits to the role of imagination in moral reasoning and what an account of this role can do for moral theory. I distinguish three kinds of constraints to imaginative reasoning, each showing problems with pragmatist moral theory: social, moral, and epistemological constraints.