Titlebook: Identity, Trust, and Reconciliation in East Asia; Dealing with Painful Kevin P Clements Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Aut

implicate

书目名称Identity, Trust, and Reconciliation in East Asia影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Identity, Trust, and Reconciliation in East Asia影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Identity, Trust, and Reconciliation in East Asia网络公开度




书目名称Identity, Trust, and Reconciliation in East Asia网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Identity, Trust, and Reconciliation in East Asia被引频次




书目名称Identity, Trust, and Reconciliation in East Asia被引频次学科排名




书目名称Identity, Trust, and Reconciliation in East Asia年度引用




书目名称Identity, Trust, and Reconciliation in East Asia年度引用学科排名




书目名称Identity, Trust, and Reconciliation in East Asia读者反馈




书目名称Identity, Trust, and Reconciliation in East Asia读者反馈学科排名

FUSC

Identity, Threat Perception, and Trust-Building in Northeast Asia,country. Some of those identities amplify threat perceptions, while others contribute to trust-building among the three countries. For example, China’s identity as an “Empire” or a “Socialist Country” amplifies threat perceptions towards Korea and Japan, while China’s identity as an “Open Market Eco

杠杆支点

招募

Historical Analogy and Demonization of Others: Memories of 1930s Japanese Militarism and Its Contems episode. We argue that shadow projection, scapegoat behaviour, revival of geopolitical discourses, and identity politics have been responsible for the dilemma of mutual demonization between both countries. Domestic abuse of political power, driven by the misuse of historical narratives and the for

Osmosis

Ganglion-Cyst

Basic Human Needs: Identity and Intractable Conflict,n international relations and how these have influenced Koreans’ perceptions towards Japan and China. We found that Koreans have generally unfavourable perceptions towards these two countries: they have negative images towards Japan and ambivalent and complex feelings towards China. In particular, d

奇思怪想

Historical Memory and Northeast Asian Regional Politics: from a Chinese Perspective,aphical proximity, economic complementarity, interdependence and cultural ties. On the other hand, the mistrust between or among the Northeast Asian countries has been so deep and long-lasting that the region has so far resisted regional integration. As socially constructed facts, historical memorie

Rebate

,Towards True Independence: Abe Shinzo’s Nationalism,ve a national other, and it does not need one. The other of Japanese nationalism is itself, its own contemporary history that began on 15 August 1945, the day Japan surrendered unconditionally to the Allied Powers in the Second World War. The nationalist other is Japan’s post-war history. For seven

Intuitive

llibretto

Trust and Trust-Building in Northeast Asia: The Need for Empathy for Japan-ROK-China Security Cooperegion as a whole. There are growing challenges, however, stemming largely from the lack of trust and insufficient trust-building, which are deeply rooted in the differences in each country’s threat perceptions as well as competing identity and recognition needs. Therefore, East Asian countries need