Titlebook: Icelandic Morphosyntax and Argument Structure; Jim Wood Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 Allomorphy marked alt

AER

吞下

星球的光亮度

虚弱

退潮

Introduction, division of labor between syntax and semantics, with a focus on recent neo-constructionist theories, the discussion turns first to a presentation of the theory to be developed and the notation to be adopted. This presentation includes the basics of phrase structure and syntactic primitives, as well

Cabg318

,The Morphosyntax of , , much of the rest of the book. The primary goal here is to defend the view that . has the morphosyntax of a clitic, rather than a suffix. While the clitic analysis has been around for some time, there is also a long tradition arguing that it is a suffix with no systematic syntactic function. The poi

musicologist

ZEST

Herbivorous

Applicatives and Applied Datives,ructure in recent years, and they are a robust aspect of Icelandic syntax. Sect. 5.1 provides an overview of different kinds of applicative structures, and argues that Icelandic does not have so-called “high applicatives,” but does have “low” and “high-low” applicatives. Sect. 5.2 turns to the analy

BIPED

More on the Syntax of -, Verbs,he analysis and argumentation there. Its purpose is both to support the general view of -. presented in previous chapters, as well as to provide a broader picture of Icelandic morphosyntax, which should allow for more thorough comparisons with other languages. Section . focuses on verbs which seem t