找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: ICU Resource Allocation in the New Millennium; Will We Say "No"? David W. Crippen Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013 C

[复制链接]
楼主: Magnanimous
发表于 2025-3-27 00:36:50 | 显示全部楼层
Germany: Where Are We Going?cians as they not only have to deliver best medical care but shall also have cost in mind, are unjust because rationing criteria differ from one case to another, and create a general fear of legal uncertainty, in turn leading to defensive medicine with the overuse of inappropriate medical acts. Furthermore, they have no democratic legitimation.
发表于 2025-3-27 03:36:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 06:05:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 09:51:31 | 显示全部楼层
Germany: Where Have We Been?f resource allocation strategies already have evolved. The second chapter deals with prospects for Germany’s health care system in the near future and future. Both chapters do not discuss future developments in the area of medical technology.
发表于 2025-3-27 16:40:41 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 21:14:38 | 显示全部楼层
India: Where Are We Going?party payees will slowly increase as out of pocket payment becomes beyond the reach of an increasing proportion of the population. Litigation, still rare, may influence medical decision making and cost. End of life considerations will have to be addressed as empty ICUs beds become increasingly difficult to find in emergencies.
发表于 2025-3-28 01:26:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 05:07:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 08:16:20 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 12:51:36 | 显示全部楼层
http://image.papertrans.cn/i/image/460228.jpg
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-18 00:17
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表