找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Human Rights and Human Nature; Marion Albers,Thomas Hoffmann,Jörn Reinhardt Book 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Alter

[复制链接]
查看: 11056|回复: 60
发表于 2025-3-21 19:37:56 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature
编辑Marion Albers,Thomas Hoffmann,Jörn Reinhardt
视频video
概述First volume to provide a comprehensive overview of naturalistic accounts on human rights.Addresses the role that human nature plays in the foundation of human rights.Provides clear insights as to how
丛书名称Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice
图书封面Titlebook: Human Rights and Human Nature;  Marion Albers,Thomas Hoffmann,Jörn Reinhardt Book 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Alter
描述.This book explores both the possibilities and limits of arguments from human nature in the context of human rights. Can the concept of human nature provide a basis for understanding fundamental rights? Is it plausible to justify the claim to universal validity of human rights by reference to human nature? Or does the idea of human rights in its modern, post-1945 manifestation go, in essence, beyond human nature? The essays in this volume introduce naturalistic positions and their concomitant critiques. They address the role that human nature both actually does and potentially may play in forming a foundation for and acting as an exemplification of fundamental rights. Beyond that, they give attention to the challenges caused by Life Sciences. Human nature itself is subject to transformation and transgression in an unprecedented manner. The essays reflect on issues such as reproduction, species manipulation, corporeal autonomy and enhancement. Contributors are jurists, philosophers and political scientists from Germany, Switzerland, Turkey, Poland and Japan..
出版日期Book 2014
关键词Alterations of Corporality And Body Images; Anthropological Arguments in Human Rights; Basis for Human
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8672-0
isbn_softcover978-94-017-7987-6
isbn_ebook978-94-017-8672-0Series ISSN 1534-6781 Series E-ISSN 2214-9902
issn_series 1534-6781
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature网络公开度




书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature被引频次




书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature被引频次学科排名




书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature年度引用




书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature年度引用学科排名




书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature读者反馈




书目名称Human Rights and Human Nature读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:16:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 04:01:16 | 显示全部楼层
978-94-017-7987-6Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014
发表于 2025-3-22 07:50:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:32:54 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8672-0Alterations of Corporality And Body Images; Anthropological Arguments in Human Rights; Basis for Human
发表于 2025-3-22 13:24:47 | 显示全部楼层
Human Rights and Human Animalse necessary to justify some of the specific contents of human rights. To that end, he portrays humans as a special sort of animal endowed with two natures. This anthropological approach provides the argumentative framework within which we can derive some, but not all, of the specific contents of human rights, as Ladwig claims.
发表于 2025-3-22 18:13:29 | 显示全部楼层
Human Rights and Basic Needsl or even most human rights, but in his view it is clear that it grounds more human rights than the idea of basic needs. He concludes that the notion of a basic need lacks the requisite underlying normative character and that is why it is not the sort of thing that can ground any rights at all.
发表于 2025-3-22 23:11:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:09:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:21:25 | 显示全部楼层
Species, Potentiality and Their Manipulation. In light of this, the article examines proposals made by Kant, Fichte, and Spaemann for how to understand the relationship between the reason and the criteria of moral status and contrasts them with recent developments in genetics that have made species membership and embryo potential, to some extent, manipulable.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-2 09:30
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表