书目名称 | How to Measure the Quality of Judicial Reasoning |
编辑 | Mátyás Bencze,Gar Yein Ng |
视频video | |
概述 | Provides theoretical and empirical foundations for debate on how a legal judgment might be measured.Incorporates the user’s (citizen‘s) perspective into the scholarly analysis of court judgments.Inclu |
丛书名称 | Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice |
图书封面 |  |
描述 | .This edited volume examines the very essence of the function of judges, building upon developments in the quality of justice research throughout Europe. Distinguished authors address a gap in the literature by considering the standards that individual judgments should meet, presenting both academic and practical perspectives. Readers are invited to consider such questions as: What is expected from judicial reasoning? Is there a general concept of good quality with regard to judicial reasoning? Are there any attempts being made to measure the quality of judicial reasoning? The focus here is on judges meeting the highest standards possible in adjudication and how they may be held to account for the way they reason. .The contributions examine theoretical questions surrounding the measurement of the quality of judicial reasoning, practices and legal systems across Europe, and judicial reasoning in various international courts. Six legal systems in Europe are featured: England andWales, Finland, Italy, the Czech Republic, France and Hungary as well as three non-domestic levels of court jurisdictions, including the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The depth and breadth of |
出版日期 | Book 2018 |
关键词 | Quality of Judicial Reasoning in Finland; Quality of Judicial Reasoning in England and Wales; Quality |
版次 | 1 |
doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97316-6 |
isbn_softcover | 978-3-030-07333-6 |
isbn_ebook | 978-3-319-97316-6Series ISSN 1534-6781 Series E-ISSN 2214-9902 |
issn_series | 1534-6781 |
copyright | Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 |