用户名  找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: How Philosophers Argue; An Adversarial Colla Fernando Leal,Hubert Marraud Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under

[复制链接]
查看: 9349|回复: 57
发表于 2025-3-21 17:32:11 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称How Philosophers Argue
副标题An Adversarial Colla
编辑Fernando Leal,Hubert Marraud
视频video
概述Is the first step-by-step analysis of a long argumentative dialogue.Contrasts two different argumentation theories as applied to the same argumentative dialogue.Examines the most famous philosophical
丛书名称Argumentation Library
图书封面Titlebook: How Philosophers Argue; An Adversarial Colla Fernando Leal,Hubert Marraud Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under
描述.This volume presents a double argumentative analysis of the debate between Bertrand Russell and Frederick Copleston on the existence of God. It includes an introduction justifying the choice of text and describing the historical and philosophical background of the debate. It also provides a transcript of the debate, based in part on the original recording..The argumentative analyses occupy Parts I and II of the book. In Part I the argumentative process is analysed by means of the ideal model of critical discussion, the workhorse of pragma-dialectics. Part I shows how the two parties go through the four stages of a critical discussion. It highlights the questions raised over and beyond the presiding question of whether God exists and examines almost a hundred questions that are raised. Many are left in the air, whereas a few others give rise to sundry sub-discussions or meta-dialogues. In Part II the theoretical framework of argument dialectic is put to work: argument structures are identified by means of punctuation marks, argumentative connectors and operators, allowing to see the argumentative exchange as the collaborative construction of a macro-argument. Such a macro-argument
出版日期Book 2022
关键词Philosophical Argumentation; Metaphilosophy; Pragma-dialectics; Argumentation in Context; Traditional Ph
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85368-6
isbn_softcover978-3-030-85370-9
isbn_ebook978-3-030-85368-6Series ISSN 1566-7650 Series E-ISSN 2215-1907
issn_series 1566-7650
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称How Philosophers Argue影响因子(影响力)




书目名称How Philosophers Argue影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称How Philosophers Argue网络公开度




书目名称How Philosophers Argue网络公开度学科排名




书目名称How Philosophers Argue被引频次




书目名称How Philosophers Argue被引频次学科排名




书目名称How Philosophers Argue年度引用




书目名称How Philosophers Argue年度引用学科排名




书目名称How Philosophers Argue读者反馈




书目名称How Philosophers Argue读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:30:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:13:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:30:16 | 显示全部楼层
Analysis of Segment IV: Discussion of Copleston’s Moral Argumentourism. Although noticeable points of contact appear now and then, none of the debaters take advantage of them and so the debate on the moral argument is as inconclusive as that on the metaphysical argument.
发表于 2025-3-22 11:03:37 | 显示全部楼层
Argument Dialectiche logical perspective understands and evaluates arguments as products that people create. My analysis is logical in that it focuses on intra. and inter.argumentative relations, and at the same time it is dialectical in that it places at the core the relations of opposition between arguments.
发表于 2025-3-22 15:16:54 | 显示全部楼层
Argumentation Structures and Operations simple or complex. Thus, e.g. the operation of concatenation yields a subordinative argument. The successive interventions of the participants in an argumentative exchange can be seen as applications of these operations, by means of which participants interactively weave a macro-argument in the course of an argumentative exchange.
发表于 2025-3-22 19:52:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:33:19 | 显示全部楼层
Co-Oriented Reasons and Modifierson stand of fall independently of one another, whereas in conjunction reasons add up. Consequently, disjunction may be a reply either to an objection or a rebuttal of an argument, while conjunction may be a reply to a refutation.
发表于 2025-3-23 02:00:31 | 显示全部楼层
Intertwined Structurestive exchange. Every countermove amounts to the application of an operation that produces a new argumentative structure. In this way, an abstract structure formed by arguments and counter-arguments can be extracted from the argumentative process.
发表于 2025-3-23 08:29:52 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-21 02:15
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表