找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation; A Controversial Lega Ramses Delafontaine Book 2015 Springer International Pu

[复制链接]
查看: 23029|回复: 57
发表于 2025-3-21 19:29:04 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation
副标题A Controversial Lega
编辑Ramses Delafontaine
视频video
概述Introduces the practice of expert witnessing by historians on both a theoretical and practical level.Features an exceptional number of court cases, including recent tobacco litigation in the United St
丛书名称Studies in the History of Law and Justice
图书封面Titlebook: Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation; A Controversial Lega Ramses Delafontaine Book 2015 Springer International Pu
描述.Historian Ramses Delafontaine presents an engaging examination of a controversial legal practice: the historian as an expert judicial witness. This book focuses on tobacco litigation in the U.S. wherein 50 historians have witnessed in 314 court cases from 1986 to 2014. The author examines the use of historical arguments in court and investigates how a legal context influences historical narratives and discourse in forensic history. Delafontaine asserts that the courtroom is a performative and fact-making theatre. Nonetheless, he argues that the civic responsibility of the historian should not end at the threshold of the courtroom where history and truth hang in the balance..The book is divided into three parts featuring an impressive range of European and American case studies. The first part provides a theoretical framework on the issues which arise when history and law interact. The second part gives a comparative overview of European and American examples of forensic history. This part also reviews U.S. legal rules and case law on expert evidence, as well as extralegal challenges historians face as experts. The third part covers a series of tobacco-related trials. With remunera
出版日期Book 2015
关键词Code of Ethics for Historians; Daubert Standard; Expert Witnesses; Forensic History; Forensification of
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14292-0
isbn_softcover978-3-319-38309-5
isbn_ebook978-3-319-14292-0Series ISSN 2198-9842 Series E-ISSN 2198-9850
issn_series 2198-9842
copyrightSpringer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation网络公开度




书目名称Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation被引频次




书目名称Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation被引频次学科排名




书目名称Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation年度引用




书目名称Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation年度引用学科排名




书目名称Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation读者反馈




书目名称Historians as Expert Judicial Witnesses in Tobacco Litigation读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:35:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:16:26 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction Part IIIians testifying for the tobacco industry remaining silent about their involvement while making hundreds of thousands of dollars through delivering doubtful historical research on the actions committed by the tobacco companies which Judge Kessler described as .; forensic history in tobacco litigation remains a controversial practice.
发表于 2025-3-22 04:49:14 | 显示全部楼层
Debates: Reflections in Academic and National Mediaexamined who the protagonists of these debates were and what their arguments were. The debate revolves around already familiar problems of advocacy, objectivity, “hired guns”, but also on an attempt by the tobacco industry to censure plaintiffs’ experts Proctor and Kyriakoudes in 2009.
发表于 2025-3-22 10:02:47 | 显示全部楼层
Historians in Tobacco Litigation, a Conclusione role of historians as an expert judicial witnesses in tobacco litigation as a controversial legal practice in general and on three specific points: advocacy, ethics, and transparency. For this chapter, I drew from my qualitative as well as quantitative analyses on the involvement of historians as expert judicial witnesses in tobacco litigation.
发表于 2025-3-22 13:35:15 | 显示全部楼层
Tobacco and Health: Towards a Contemporary Perspectiveapter furthermore considers the 1964 Surgeon General Report on smoking. Lastly this second chapter covers the industry’s ability to evade litigation and government oversight through well-funded lobbying networks.
发表于 2025-3-22 20:02:06 | 显示全部楼层
The Tobacco Industry and Its Tacticssy on smoking despite the fact that the tobacco companies’ own scientists had convincing evidence to the contrary. These tactics by the tobacco industry are key elements of the testimony of expert historians in tobacco litigation today.
发表于 2025-3-22 21:53:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:08:51 | 显示全部楼层
2198-9842 cases, including recent tobacco litigation in the United St.Historian Ramses Delafontaine presents an engaging examination of a controversial legal practice: the historian as an expert judicial witness. This book focuses on tobacco litigation in the U.S. wherein 50 historians have witnessed in 314
发表于 2025-3-23 09:22:52 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-4 05:37
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表