找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Heidegger, Neoplatonism, and the History of Being; Relation as Ontologi James Filler Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author

[复制链接]
楼主: Philanthropist
发表于 2025-3-23 10:13:34 | 显示全部楼层
James FillerD protein structure using distance information obtained from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) experiments [., .]. It is worth mentioning that the 2002 Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to the chemist Kurt Wüthrich for the development of the application of NMR to determine protein structures using
发表于 2025-3-23 17:55:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 19:07:43 | 显示全部楼层
Beginningsblem, and how it is manifested historically. A discussion of recent thinkers who tried to deal with the problem. A discussion of Myth and Logos; the origins of the conceptualization of Being. A brief examination of Hans Blumenberg’s understanding of myth as a “fleeing in the face of Being”. An argum
发表于 2025-3-23 22:22:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 06:05:54 | 显示全部楼层
The Neoplatonists: The Path of Relationlationality becomes more obvious in the Trinitarian understanding of the Christian Neoplatonists. The Trinity represents a shift in the understanding of relation as . (toward some thing) to relation as . (state or condition). A discussion of the understanding of the Trinity as relation in the Cappad
发表于 2025-3-24 10:27:14 | 显示全部楼层
The Aristotelians: The Path of Substancehe Scholastic understanding of God. An explanation of Aristotle’s understanding of substance and how his understanding of substance grounds his understanding of relation. A brief discussion on how the Aristotelian understanding impacts Scholastic thinking on God. God is understood as essentially One
发表于 2025-3-24 12:51:28 | 显示全部楼层
Heidegger has become problematic. Heidegger moves beyond Husserl’s phenomenology, rejects substance as the way to understand reality, and so begins to offer a “new” way to understand Being. How Being is understood relationally. The distinction between present-at-hand and ready-to-hand. Presence-at-hand (subs
发表于 2025-3-24 17:22:14 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusionrs purport to see relation as ontologically foundational. A brief examination of Whitehead, Rescher, Niemoczynski, and Benjamin. How they all fall short of an ontology truly grounded upon relationality. Relationality as definitive for the understanding of personhood. Metaphysical, epistemological, a
发表于 2025-3-24 22:40:59 | 显示全部楼层
James FillerOffers a new understanding of being in terms of relationality.Demonstrates why the understanding of being as substance is flawed.Traces the history of relational ontology from the Presocratics to Heid
发表于 2025-3-24 23:40:40 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-1 17:06
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表