找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Harming Future Persons; Ethics, Genetics and Melinda A. Roberts,David T. Wasserman Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Chil

[复制链接]
查看: 19316|回复: 48
发表于 2025-3-21 19:09:36 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Harming Future Persons
副标题Ethics, Genetics and
编辑Melinda A. Roberts,David T. Wasserman
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/425/424252/424252.mp4
概述Examines what we owe future persons from both moral and legal perspectives.Deeply probes particular concerns in areas ranging from the new reproductive technologies to the structure of morality.Ranges
丛书名称International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine
图书封面Titlebook: Harming Future Persons; Ethics, Genetics and Melinda A. Roberts,David T. Wasserman Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Chil
描述Melinda A. Roberts and David T. Wasserman 1 Purpose of this Collection What are our obligations with respect to persons who have not yet, and may not ever, come into existence? Few of us believe that we can wrong those whom we leave out of existence altogether—that is, merely possible persons. We may think as well that the directive to be “fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth” 1 does not hold up to close scrutiny. How can it be wrong to decline to bring ever more people into existence? At the same time, we think we are clearly ob- gated to treat future persons—persons who don’t yet but will exist—in accordance with certain stringent standards. Bringing a person into an existence that is truly awful—not worth having—can be wrong, and so can bringing a person into an existence that is worth having when we had the alternative of bringing that same person into an existence that is substantially better. We may think as well that our obligations with respect to future persons are triggered well before the point at which those persons commence their existence. We think it would be wrong, for example, to choose today to turn the Earth of the future into a miserable place even if
出版日期Book 2009
关键词Children‘s rights; Consequentialism; Ethics; Future Generations; Harm; Ligation; Reproductive; bioethics; ge
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5697-0
isbn_softcover978-94-007-2604-8
isbn_ebook978-1-4020-5697-0Series ISSN 1567-8008 Series E-ISSN 2351-955X
issn_series 1567-8008
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Harming Future Persons影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Harming Future Persons影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Harming Future Persons网络公开度




书目名称Harming Future Persons网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Harming Future Persons被引频次




书目名称Harming Future Persons被引频次学科排名




书目名称Harming Future Persons年度引用




书目名称Harming Future Persons年度引用学科排名




书目名称Harming Future Persons读者反馈




书目名称Harming Future Persons读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:46:07 | 显示全部楼层
Wrongful Life and Procreative Decisionsarticular impairment precludes a minimally decent life, there will be circumstances in which a future life is unlikely to hold a reasonable promise of containing the things that make human lives good. In these circumstances, and if reproduction is avoidable, we are required to forego reproduction altogether.
发表于 2025-3-22 03:04:45 | 显示全部楼层
The Nonidentity Problem and the Two Envelope Problem: When is One Act Better for a Person than Anothn just the cases in respect of which one important type of nonidentity problem has long been thought to show “no harm done” and (2) . in the two envelope problem, which purports to show “harm done” when the subject refuses endlessly to switch from one envelope to another and back again.
发表于 2025-3-22 08:21:01 | 显示全部楼层
der substantiell unterschiedlichen Effekte, die unter dem Begriff »AgendaSetting« oft leichtfertig subsumiert werden. Um mit der einleitenden Metapher zu sprechen: die von den blinden Männern ertasteten wissenschaftlichen Teilbefunde passen einfach nicht zusammen, sie scheinen vielmehr Teile ganz verschiedener Tiere zu sein..
发表于 2025-3-22 08:52:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:47:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:09:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:10:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:34:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:27:45 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-4 13:01
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表