找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Hard and Unreal Advice; Mothers, Social Scie Kathleen Callanan Martin Book 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limi

[复制链接]
楼主: 乌鸦
发表于 2025-3-26 23:21:01 | 显示全部楼层
Kathleen Callanan Martinorkers; and (3) a general audience of persons with an interest in African American adolescent female’s well-being and developmentsuch as parents, community leaders, girl’s group leaders (i. e. , Girl Scout leaders), and church and spiritual leaders. This book is both descriptive and practical. Each
发表于 2025-3-27 04:31:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 07:57:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 11:10:10 | 显示全部楼层
he writers attend to the peculiarities of witnessing the real violence done to black women against the imagined violence done to white women. Such violence, and its inherent mantra to “Keep the Negro Down” (Hopkins 178), connects the antebellum period to the postbellum era. Consequently, black write
发表于 2025-3-27 16:27:26 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2008The first detailed and systematic study of the social science of poverty as practiced by the Victorian experts who had so much influence on relief policy in this area, and who were among the founders of British social science. The book examines what they knew, or what they thought they knew, about the poor.
发表于 2025-3-27 18:02:52 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594050bibliography; Case Studies; critique; economy; law; policy; poverty; relief; science; Victorian era
发表于 2025-3-28 00:28:14 | 显示全部楼层
http://image.papertrans.cn/h/image/424161.jpg
发表于 2025-3-28 05:26:59 | 显示全部楼层
Protestant Paradigms in Victorian Poverty Studies,aditional “Christian charity.” While she considered this recognition belated, in fact it reflected an attitude long established in the thinking of many English Protestants. The road from the monastic almshouse to the parish workhouse passed decisively through the Protestant Reformation.
发表于 2025-3-28 06:47:56 | 显示全部楼层
Science and Pseudoscience in Victorian and Edwardian Poverty Studies,eenth-century poverty research. Why did Bosanquet, despite the obvious defects of the 1832 inquiry, see it as a “scientific basis” for poor law policy? And, for that matter, why did Bosanquet . a scientific basis for social policy?
发表于 2025-3-28 13:35:35 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-3 09:02
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表