Titlebook: Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy; Julien Chaisse,Leïla Choukroune,Sufian Jusoh Living reference work 20200th edition I

PEL

书目名称Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy网络公开度




书目名称Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy被引频次




书目名称Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy被引频次学科排名




书目名称Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy年度引用




书目名称Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy年度引用学科排名




书目名称Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy读者反馈




书目名称Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy读者反馈学科排名

Flustered

Performance Requirement Prohibitions in International Investment Law,to digital trade. It suggests that the developmental potential of performance requirements must not be ignored as new disciplines governing their use are developed in line with changes to the modern global economy.

hazard

要求比…更好

Non-precluded Measures Clauses: Regime, Trends, and Practice,rpretive ambiguities that can accompany NPM clauses. Indeed, it will be argued that while NPM clauses do raise some difficulties with respect to extending the policy space of contracting parties, they are relatively effective in ensuring that public policy is a permanent feature of arbitrators’ matr

indecipherable

The Standard of Most-Favored-Nation Treatment in Investor-State Dispute Settlement Practice,s been greater harmonization of investment treaty protections..The historically vague expression of MFN treatment in treaties has effectively shifted interpretive authority from the state party to treaties to private arbitrators. Meanwhile, different expressions of MFN treatment in treaties and the

Obvious

Essential Security Interests in International Investment Law: A Tale of Two ISDS Claims Against Indhat the two Indian cases make useful contributions to the evolving jurisprudence on the security reservation on all the issues identified above. The tribunals make vital additions on matters like meaning of ‘necessary’ and on ‘standard of review,’ which would be useful for future tribunals while int

按等级

,“One-Stop” Commercial Dispute Resolution Services: Implications for International Investment Law,and court judgments and mediated settlement agreements, on the other. A narrower enforceability gap would reduce the significance of one of the key advantages of international arbitration: an unmatched global enforcement regime. The diminished significance of that advantage likely would place additi

窗帘等

Public Participation: Amicus Curiae in International Investment Arbitration,does not undermine the purposes of the dispute settlement mechanism. In order to strike this balance, tribunals should only accept submissions from individuals or organizations who offer guarantees of independence, autonomy, and credibility.

Seizure

Arbitration Clauses Limited to Compensation due to Expropriation: Relevant Case Law, Interpretive T an analysis of China’s treaty policy and practice on this type of clauses and then synthesizes the relevant arbitral findings in cases that have arisen both out of Chinese and non-Chinese investment treaties. With specific regard to China, the conclusion is that interpretive inconsistencies on the

conflate

ICS from South East Asia Perspective,ent system which is called Investment Court System, and looking at the free trade agreement EU has entered with Canada, Vietnam, and Singapore, there is no doubt the provision will be more or less similar with those agreements. This system offers an improved mechanism of any investment dispute arise