用户名  找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Handbook for Evaluating Knowledge-Based Systems; Conceptual Framework Leonard Adelman,Sharon L. Riedel Book 1997 Springer Science+Business

[复制链接]
查看: 25920|回复: 47
发表于 2025-3-21 18:42:15 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Handbook for Evaluating Knowledge-Based Systems
副标题Conceptual Framework
编辑Leonard Adelman,Sharon L. Riedel
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Handbook for Evaluating Knowledge-Based Systems; Conceptual Framework Leonard Adelman,Sharon L. Riedel Book 1997 Springer Science+Business
描述Knowledge-based systems are increasingly found in a widevariety of settings and this handbook has been written to meet aspecific need in their widening use. While there have been manysuccessful applications of knowledge-based systems, some applicationshave failed because they never received the corrective feedback thatevaluation provides for keeping development focused on the users‘needs in their actual working environment. This handbook provides aconceptual framework and compendium of methods for performingevaluations of knowledge-based systems during their development. Itsfocus is on the users‘ and subject matter experts‘ evaluation of theusefulness of the system, and not on the developers‘ testing of theadequacy of the programming code. The handbook permits evaluators tosystematically answer the following kinds of questions: Does theknowledge-based system meet the users‘ task requirements? Is thesystem easy to use? Is the knowledge base logically consistent? Doesit meet the required level of expertise? Does the system improveperformance? .The authors have produced a handbook that will serve two audiences: atool that can be used to create knowledge-based systems(practitioners, de
出版日期Book 1997
关键词knowledge; knowledge base; knowledge-based system; knowledge-based systems; programming; system developme
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6171-2
isbn_softcover978-1-4613-7829-7
isbn_ebook978-1-4615-6171-2
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media New York 1997
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Handbook for Evaluating Knowledge-Based Systems影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Handbook for Evaluating Knowledge-Based Systems影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Handbook for Evaluating Knowledge-Based Systems网络公开度




书目名称Handbook for Evaluating Knowledge-Based Systems网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Handbook for Evaluating Knowledge-Based Systems被引频次




书目名称Handbook for Evaluating Knowledge-Based Systems被引频次学科排名




书目名称Handbook for Evaluating Knowledge-Based Systems年度引用




书目名称Handbook for Evaluating Knowledge-Based Systems年度引用学科排名




书目名称Handbook for Evaluating Knowledge-Based Systems读者反馈




书目名称Handbook for Evaluating Knowledge-Based Systems读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:43:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:41:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:01:41 | 显示全部楼层
Requirements Validation,ng.” As he pointed out, “Lack of good requirements has caused the failure of multimillion dollar projects, has impeded development productivity, and has been a major contributor to the rise of software maintenance costs.”
发表于 2025-3-22 12:25:06 | 显示全部楼层
Knowledge Base Validation,s. Knowledge base verification focuses on assessing the logical consistency and logical completeness of the knowledge base. That will be the focus of the next chapter. In contrast, knowledge base validation focuses on assessing the functional completeness and predictive accuracy of the knowledge bas
发表于 2025-3-22 13:22:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:29:40 | 显示全部楼层
Planning and Managing Knowledge-Based System Evaluations,ber of different design and development phases, and often different modules developed using different design approaches that must work together. The life cycle evaluations of the system will be correspondingly complex. They involve different types of evaluations, services of users and subject matter
发表于 2025-3-23 00:33:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 02:19:28 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20422-9 the different types of prototyping approaches. There are a variety of development models for knowledge-based systems, and the life cycle evaluation for a particular system should accommodate the development model being used. The next chapter shows how our conceptual framework accommodates different
发表于 2025-3-23 05:44:27 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-21 11:32
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表