Titlebook: Habermas, Foucault and the Political-Legal Discussions in China; A Discourse on Law a Fan Yang Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and

噱头

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34306-3questions: What is the general role of the new media . in China’s politics today? What are the power relations and factors regarding the new public sphere? How are the performances of Habermas’s conceptions, Foucault’s claims, and . in China today? To answer these questions, this chapter is divided

邪恶的你

Introduction,xt has always been an important concern. Since the . in 1919, when the concepts of . (德先生, Mr. De) and . (赛先生, Mr. Sai) were introduced into Chinese society on a wide scale, democracy has been regarded as the inevitable issue in the modernisation of Chinese society.

comely

Addictive

: Another Normative Interpretation on Discourse Theory,and makes some comparisons with Habermas’s concept of . and Foucault’s .. Although the conception of Confucian Rationality is also a type of normative interpretation, we believe that it may play an important role in balancing the tension between Habermas’s and Foucault’s two normative theories.

狂乱

万灵丹

激励

雄伟

Susan Laird,Kristen Ogilvie Holzern Western academia, we discuss and define it from a new perspective. Specifically, we show that the difference between Foucault and Habermas is a type of fundamental tension in a Western cultural context.

muffler

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34306-3here? How are the performances of Habermas’s conceptions, Foucault’s claims, and . in China today? To answer these questions, this chapter is divided into two sections: a general study and a case study.

Intellectual

,Communicative Rationality or Power Discourse: Foucault’s Challenge to Habermas,n Western academia, we discuss and define it from a new perspective. Specifically, we show that the difference between Foucault and Habermas is a type of fundamental tension in a Western cultural context.