Titlebook: HIV/AIDS in China and India; Governing Health Sec Catherine Yuk-ping Lo Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 201

辩论的终结

The Crippling of the Private Brandersthe Indian government in 2004. However, as argued in chapter 7, the full securitizing move in 2004 was no longer maintained within the Indian government. In other words, HIV/AIDS was no longer framed as the most serious problem or perceived as a top-priority issue in the national government agenda.

四溢

Industrial Relations in Practice Seriesoration of existing debates on securitization theory, the major shortcomings of the theory were repackaged, including the lack of operationalization and differentiation, together with the presence of Eurocentrism of securitization theory in general, and the three core elements, namely “speech acts,”

cliche

Introduction,uired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS).. It was a death of a foreigner caused by the so-called Western disease. This was the first case of HIV/AIDS to be documented in China. In India, the first reported case of HIV/AIDS death was that of a businessman in Mumbai the following year.. Indian offi

联想记忆

FLORA

的是兄弟

The Changing Face of Public Health Care Systems in China and India,security, and also how HIV/AIDS has been securitized at the international level since 2000. Chapters 5–8 explain how HIV/AIDS is being securitized in China and India at the national and subnational levels. While it is necessary to understand how HIV/AIDS has become a health security problem in China

剥削

争论

Junction

沙文主义

Audience Acceptance in India: Case Studies in New Delhi, Mumbai, and Imphal,the Indian government in 2004. However, as argued in chapter 7, the full securitizing move in 2004 was no longer maintained within the Indian government. In other words, HIV/AIDS was no longer framed as the most serious problem or perceived as a top-priority issue in the national government agenda.