Titlebook: Emerging Trends in International Development and Climate Policy; A Focus on Korea and Stephan Klingebiel,Thomas Kalinowski,Niels Keijzer Bo

Aggregate

把手

CLEFT

The Evolution of Research and Partnership Activities in Support of Urban Transformation: The EU’s Ret of the EU–Republic of Korea (hereafter referred to as Korea) Green Partnership established in May 2023, and therefore have implications for the forging of impactful green collaborations between the EU and Korea.

使混合

Private Sector Engagement Policies in South Korea: Challenges and Policy Recommendationso concerns that fragmentation will further deepen as ODA funds are divided due to mutual non-interference among various actors. Finally, this study discusses policy implications for Korean private companies to be development agents which are derived from the case of German private sector engagement.

补角

Multilateralism and Climate Justicehe perspective of climate justice, along with implications for policymakers and practitioners and cases from the Republic of Korea (hereafter referred to as Korea) and Germany. This study sheds new light on the potential for multilateral climate governance to advance climate justice.

外星人

A Comparative Analysis of the Climate Change Mitigation Efforts of Korea and Germany: Implemented Ted (GCF), Korea prioritizes smaller scale TM-backed technical assistance and domestic infrastructure, while Germany focuses on larger, GCF-financed international projects. This offers valuable insights into complementary national approaches to leverage technology collaboration for effective climate action.

BUCK

Medley

机密

flutter

Maximiliano Nardelli,Juan Ignacio Túnez have their strengths and weaknesses. Germany is more advanced in emission reduction, energy efficiency and environmental conscious behaviour, while Korea leads in investment in green infrastructure and industries. These distinct traits can be explained by path-dependent political economies. In Germ