找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Extraordinary Rendition and Human Rights; Examining State Acco Suzanne Egan Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), unde

[复制链接]
查看: 48489|回复: 38
发表于 2025-3-21 19:14:32 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Extraordinary Rendition and Human Rights
副标题Examining State Acco
编辑Suzanne Egan
视频video
概述Provides legal analysis on extraordinary rendition.Distinguishes between various forms of accountability to focus the prospect of achieving “legal accountability” for complicity in Europe.Shines a lig
图书封面Titlebook: Extraordinary Rendition and Human Rights; Examining State Acco Suzanne Egan Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), unde
描述.This book explores the potential of international human rights law to resolve one of the gravest human rights violations to have surfaced post 9/11: extraordinary rendition.  Although infamously deployed as a counter-terrorism technique, substantial evidence confirms that European states colluded in the practice by facilitating the transportation of suspects through their airspace or airports and in some cases, secret detention on their territories. Despite recent findings of the European Court of Human Rights, difficulties persist in holding many European States accountable for the role they played both at the domestic and international level. Distinguishing between various forms of accountability and interrogating the evolving parameters of international human rights law, this volume will fill gaps in extraordinary rendition literature and influence the policies of European States..
出版日期Book 2019
关键词extroardinary rendition; European politics; international human rights law; counter-terrorism; European
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04122-9
isbn_ebook978-3-030-04122-9
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Extraordinary Rendition and Human Rights影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Extraordinary Rendition and Human Rights影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Extraordinary Rendition and Human Rights网络公开度




书目名称Extraordinary Rendition and Human Rights网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Extraordinary Rendition and Human Rights被引频次




书目名称Extraordinary Rendition and Human Rights被引频次学科排名




书目名称Extraordinary Rendition and Human Rights年度引用




书目名称Extraordinary Rendition and Human Rights年度引用学科排名




书目名称Extraordinary Rendition and Human Rights读者反馈




书目名称Extraordinary Rendition and Human Rights读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:27:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:00:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:31:21 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-35198-7human rights law. It concludes that human rights bodies, in particular the ECtHRts, have begun to apply an imputational, risk-based rule of State responsibility for complicity that is clearly wider than the traditional approach expressed in ARSIWA.
发表于 2025-3-22 09:31:14 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:56:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:58:27 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-32888-0 and experts, the UN treaty bodies and the ECtHRts have refused to rule out a priori the usage of diplomatic assurances in such cases. Accordingly, the possibility of reliance on such assurances constitutes a regrettable loophole in the efforts to deter extraordinary rendition and complicity in such practices in the future.
发表于 2025-3-23 00:03:18 | 显示全部楼层
The Shelter of Diplomatic Assurances, and experts, the UN treaty bodies and the ECtHRts have refused to rule out a priori the usage of diplomatic assurances in such cases. Accordingly, the possibility of reliance on such assurances constitutes a regrettable loophole in the efforts to deter extraordinary rendition and complicity in such practices in the future.
发表于 2025-3-23 03:12:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 06:38:21 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-26 02:19
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表