找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Explaining Games; The Epistemic Progra Boudewijn de Bruin Book 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Epistemic logic.Games.Knowled

[复制链接]
查看: 45746|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 17:38:45 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Explaining Games
副标题The Epistemic Progra
编辑Boudewijn de Bruin
视频video
概述Draws together research in epistemic logic and the philosophy of the social sciences.Provides the first book-length contribution to the emerging field of philosophy of game theory.Gives a fascinating,
丛书名称Synthese Library
图书封面Titlebook: Explaining Games; The Epistemic Progra Boudewijn de Bruin Book 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Epistemic logic.Games.Knowled
描述Does game theory - the mathematical theory of strategic interaction - provide genuine explanations of human behaviour? Can game theory be used in economic consultancy or other normative contexts? Explaining Games: The Epistemic Programme in Game Theory - the first monograph on the philosophy of game theory - is a bold attempt to combine insights from epistemic logic and the philosophy of science to investigate the applicability of game theory in such fields as economics, philosophy and strategic consultancy. De Bruin proves new mathematical theorems about the beliefs, desires and rationality principles of individual human beings, and he explores in detail the logical form of game theory as it is used in explanatory and normative contexts. He argues that game theory reduces to rational choice theory if used as an explanatory device, and that game theory is nonsensical if used as a normative device. A provocative account of the history of game theory reveals that this is not bad news for all of game theory, though. Two central research programmes in game theory tried to find the ultimate characterisation of strategic interaction between rational agents. Yet, while the Nash Equilibriu
出版日期Book 2010
关键词Epistemic logic; Games; Knowledge; Philosophy of Science; Rational choice theory; Rationality; game theory
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9906-9
isbn_softcover978-94-007-3331-2
isbn_ebook978-1-4020-9906-9Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
issn_series 0166-6991
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Explaining Games影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Explaining Games影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Explaining Games网络公开度




书目名称Explaining Games网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Explaining Games被引频次




书目名称Explaining Games被引频次学科排名




书目名称Explaining Games年度引用




书目名称Explaining Games年度引用学科排名




书目名称Explaining Games读者反馈




书目名称Explaining Games读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:46:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 04:14:41 | 显示全部楼层
Applications of Game Theory–Fudenberg procedure is not necessarily the only consequence of common true belief about payoff-uncertainty, and that both Aumann’s and Reny’s analyses of backward induction make conceptually inconsistent assumptions.
发表于 2025-3-22 07:44:29 | 显示全部楼层
0166-6991 ging field of philosophy of game theory.Gives a fascinating,Does game theory - the mathematical theory of strategic interaction - provide genuine explanations of human behaviour? Can game theory be used in economic consultancy or other normative contexts? Explaining Games: The Epistemic Programme in
发表于 2025-3-22 11:32:36 | 显示全部楼层
Policy-Transfer und Policy-Diffusionnot common true belief about rationality leads to backward induction. Robert Aumann defends a position in favour of this implication, Philip Reny objects, and both positions are taken by various other theorists.
发表于 2025-3-22 14:50:33 | 显示全部楼层
Burkhard Niederhoff,Roland Weidleted to a view of scientific methodology that declares economic theory, if true at all, only true ‘in the abstract’. In that view, game theory does not so much study strategic interaction of economic agents reasoning on the basis of beliefs, desires and rationality principles, as relate it to a field of vaguely adumbrated ‘truths-in-the-abstract’.
发表于 2025-3-22 17:34:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:09:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:35:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:12:47 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-25 02:38
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表