Titlebook: Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis; Paul J. H. Schoemaker Book 1980 Springer Science+Business Media Dord

Malinger

书目名称Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis网络公开度




书目名称Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis被引频次




书目名称Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis被引频次学科排名




书目名称Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis年度引用




书目名称Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis年度引用学科排名




书目名称Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis读者反馈




书目名称Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis读者反馈学科排名

音乐等

Alternative Descriptive Models,ew of the various classes of models, while the second discusses the so-called holistic judgment models, most of which are modifications of EU theory and fall into the category of “as-if” models. Rather than claiming to offer descriptions of the decision process, these models purport to predict behav

平淡而无味

An Experimental Study of Insurance Decisons,ams, 1966). Unlike speculative risk choices, pure risk alternatives offer no chance of gain. The present study ran parallel to another research effort, also based at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. This other effort consisted of field studies (Kunreuther et al., 1978) and labor

Arresting

Intellectual

Risk Taking and Problem Context in the Domain of Losses,in the loss domain. The second involves the influence that a gamble’s context or presentation exerts on revealed risk-taking attitudes. These questions were examined through an experimental design in which probabilities, probabilistic losses, and premiums were systematically varied (see Table 7.1 an

LUDE

LUDE

scrip­ tive validity of expected utility theory as a model of choice under uncer­ tainty. His principal message is that this paradigm is too narrow in its con­ ception and misses some of the important elements of a descriptive model of individual choice. In particular, Schoemaker calls attention to

保守

Wilhelm Bauer,Stefan Rief,Mitja Jurecic the attribute(s) under consideration. Both of these elements are captured through a utility function so that maximizing expected utility becomes the guide to rational behavior in more complex situations.

Exposition

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77371-7 were familiar with statistics (particularly such concepts as expected value, random variable, and expected utility theory) were significantly more calculative (i.e., less intuitive) than were those who did not know any of these concepts..

nuclear-tests

Book 1980e validity of expected utility theory as a model of choice under uncer­ tainty. His principal message is that this paradigm is too narrow in its con­ ception and misses some of the important elements of a descriptive model of individual choice. In particular, Schoemaker calls attention to the impor­