找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Experimental Inquiries; Historical, Philosop H. E. Grand Book 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990 Gregor Johann Mendel.Humphry Davy.dynamo

[复制链接]
楼主: invoke
发表于 2025-3-23 11:35:54 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 16:39:56 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6294-5eneral, is an open-ended and uncertain affair: existing culture does not determine the contours of its own extension. This raises the question of how and why actors, in fact, extend culture in one way rather than another, of how openness is managed, of how closure is achieved, in practice. Many stud
发表于 2025-3-23 19:23:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 22:18:32 | 显示全部楼层
Studies in History and Philosophy of Sciencehttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/318856.jpg
发表于 2025-3-24 05:57:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 07:12:33 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46581-4nt doctrine of the Noble Savage. Rejecting the long-held assumption of a natural relationship between savagery and strength, Peron claims instead that the state of savagery is inherently a state of feebleness.
发表于 2025-3-24 12:58:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 18:17:23 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6294-5and why actors, in fact, extend culture in one way rather than another, of how openness is managed, of how closure is achieved, in practice. Many studies bear upon this question, but I want to approach it from a new angle. My aim is to open up for analysis the neglected topic of goal-formation in science.
发表于 2025-3-24 22:19:48 | 显示全部楼层
The Dynamometer and the Diemenese,nt doctrine of the Noble Savage. Rejecting the long-held assumption of a natural relationship between savagery and strength, Peron claims instead that the state of savagery is inherently a state of feebleness.
发表于 2025-3-25 02:04:35 | 显示全部楼层
,Humphry Davy and ‘The Lever of Experiment’,ific practice marks the degree to which we have departd from a naive philosophical view of the nature of science. From that point of view, experiments are taken to represent nature just as it is and they simply communicate natural facts. Not to be convinced by them would be to violate the basic methodological rules of the scientific enterprise.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-3 16:49
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表