找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox; Contemporary Discuss Maurice Allais,Ole Hagen Book 1979 Springer Science+Business Media

[复制链接]
查看: 38496|回复: 51
发表于 2025-3-21 17:28:58 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox
副标题Contemporary Discuss
编辑Maurice Allais,Ole Hagen
视频video
丛书名称Theory and Decision Library
图书封面Titlebook: Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox; Contemporary Discuss Maurice Allais,Ole Hagen Book 1979 Springer Science+Business Media
描述Utility theory or, value theory in general, is certainly the cornerstone of decision theory, game theory, microecon~mics, and all social and political theories which deal with public decisions. Recently the American School of utility, founded by von N eumann­ Morgenstern, encountered a far-going criticism by the French School of utility represented by its founder Allais. The whole basis of the theory of decisions involving risk has been shaken and put into question. Consequently, basic research in the fundamentals of utility and value theory evolved into a crisis. Like any crisis in basic research, and this one was not an exception, it was very fruitful. One may simply say: Allais versus von Neumann-Morgenstern, or the French School of utility versus the American School, became one of the battlefields of scientific development which proved to be a most creative source of new advances and new developments in all those sciences which are based on evaluation of utilities.
出版日期Book 1979
关键词basic research; crisis; criticism; decision theory; development; evaluation; game theory; nature; research; s
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7629-1
isbn_softcover978-90-481-8354-8
isbn_ebook978-94-015-7629-1
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 1979
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox网络公开度




书目名称Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox被引频次




书目名称Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox被引频次学科排名




书目名称Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox年度引用




书目名称Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox年度引用学科排名




书目名称Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox读者反馈




书目名称Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:27:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:05:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:11:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:25:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:02:55 | 显示全部楼层
Marius van der Put,Michael F. Singer function has certain properties. The paper gives a brief survey of the relationships between the utility functions and stochastic dominance of different orders. It is pointed out that the principle of stochastic dominance of the first order is the main axiom in the theory which Allais outlined in 1
发表于 2025-3-22 18:46:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:24:55 | 显示全部楼层
Results from Algebraic Number Theory,ual formulation of decision theory the utility function is assumed to be known and fixed. The assumption of a fixed utility function gives rise to inconsistencies of the type illustrated by the ‘Allais paradox’. We have explored a series of examples in which the individual compares the expected util
发表于 2025-3-23 02:30:11 | 显示全部楼层
,-Klassengruppe und ,-Klassenkörperturm,dence axiom, and an Archimedean condition. It is argued that the core of their idea is captured by parts of their first two axioms, namely that ≻ on . is asymmetric, and that λ. + (1– λ). ≻ λ. + (1– λ). whenever 0 < λ < 1, . ≻ . and . ≻ ..These less demanding axioms overcome criticisms of the origin
发表于 2025-3-23 07:28:46 | 显示全部楼层
The Second Week: Equivalence Classeson of the St. Petersburg game. The puzzle is that it seems reasonable to refuse to play the game, contrary to Bayesian analysis, yet the game is immune to Jeffrey’s original objections. A partially systematic account of the rationality of refusal can be based on the observation that in making decisi
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-12 17:26
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表