找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Executive Secrecy and Democratic Politics; Arguments and Practi Dorothee Riese Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), u

[复制链接]
楼主: 浮浅
发表于 2025-3-23 10:57:51 | 显示全部楼层
Executive Secrecy and Democratic Politics978-3-031-30605-1Series ISSN 2947-6747 Series E-ISSN 2947-6755
发表于 2025-3-23 14:51:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 21:44:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 01:03:26 | 显示全部楼层
From the New Hebrides to Vanuatu,ament. The chapter shows that substantive arguments about the necessity of secrecy are highly contested: When and under what circumstances secrecy is needed, and whether the goal pursued through it weighs out other considerations is disputed. Both partisan and role-specific conflict lines (between g
发表于 2025-3-24 03:37:15 | 显示全部楼层
France in an Era of Global War, 1914-1945erns in justifying secrecy. Much conflict ignites over the issue of the desirability of PPPs as such. If they are considered a worthwhile instrument of public procurement, secrecy is justified as a necessary feature of their success. By contrast, critics question whether private business secrets sho
发表于 2025-3-24 06:51:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 14:11:41 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 18:32:53 | 显示全部楼层
Theorising and Studying Democratic Secrecy,, it argues that substantive justifications alone fail to legitimise secrecy independently. Therefore, the concept of procedural legitimation is introduced. Finally, the chapter discusses how to empirically analyse the legitimation of secrecy, laying out the agenda for the empirical part of the book
发表于 2025-3-24 20:51:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 02:21:37 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-1 22:22
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表