Titlebook: Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt; D’Maris Coffman Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2

Kennedy

书目名称Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt网络公开度




书目名称Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt被引频次




书目名称Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt被引频次学科排名




书目名称Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt年度引用




书目名称Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt年度引用学科排名




书目名称Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt读者反馈




书目名称Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt读者反馈学科排名

笨拙处理

揉杂

烦忧

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137371553economy; political economy; science and technology; taxation

Graduated

Loren B. Landau,Iriann Freemantlest historians agree that in the British Isles the transition from a late medieval demesne-state to a tax state occurred in the seventeenth century, culminating in the Financial Revolution of the 1690s (Schumpeter, 1918; Braddick, 1994, pp. 1–21).. Yet no major work of scholarship has looked closely

ablate

Introduction: Medieval by a Month,ical negotiations that led to the imposition of the excises in July 1643 helps to explain why this outcome is so surprising. By employing previously under-used sources in the National Archives, the Bodleian Library and the British Library, it is possible to reconstruct how the parliamentary excise w

ablate

Virginia Kinnear,Erich Ch. Wittmannere servants of the state, had been hired for their willingness to make loans to the government in advance of receipts. When they proved unable to meet Parliament’s borrowing requirements, private parties were permitted to make loans with the revenue from these ordinances as security. There is a gen

不适

会犯错误

Germano Resconi,Masoud Nikravesheceive separate treatment in the scholarly literature. The ‘Soap Makers Complaint’ of 1650 offers an opportunity to view disputes about the excise on soap through the lens of the controversies attendant to the earlier soap patents. Rather than offering evidence for generalised resistance to the exci

富足女人