Titlebook: Evidence in Anti-Doping at the Intersection of Science & Law; Marjolaine Viret Book 2016 T.M.C. Asser Press and the author 2016 2015 World

弄污

ticlopidine

Doping Control—Gathering Scientific Evidence for Legal Purposes of evidentiary issues, with different ways of approaching these issues. In outlining the legal constraints on anti-doping, we have described, in Chap. ., Doping Control as a process designed to collect scientific evidence for use in subsequent anti-doping proceedings. Section . focuses on the regul

漂浮

Analytical Science—Approaches in “Traditional” Doping Controls—depends on how closely these procedures can be scientifically justified. Understanding the subtleties of anti-doping science is a prerequisite for assessing the evidentiary WADC regime. This Chapter focuses on the activities of anti-doping laboratories, analyses the historical pillars of the WADC

细微差别

刺穿

Oafishness

Mechanisms Used in “Traditional” Doping Control need to be set up in a scientific context. After our analysis of the WADC evidentiary regime in Part II, we are now able to describe this regime through a synthesis of the various mechanisms used by its drafters when called upon to accommodate the high degree of standardisation and simplification t

Working-Memory

Paths to Improvement Through New Approachesand will continue to face under the 2015 WADC. Addressing these challenges requires that scientists and lawyers combine their expertise and their efforts to design paths to improvement (Sect. .). These joint efforts should allow for a stronger qualitative approach to the gathering of evidence in Dop

STENT

Athlete Biological Passport: A Paradigm Shift?orities in the fight against doping; a deterrence effect due to the higher likelihood of being “caught”; and gathering intelligence for target Testing. This Chap. . focuses on the Athlete Biological Passport’s most crucial function from the perspective of its evidentiary value in legal practice. It

创新

General Conclusions: Interdisciplinary Dialogue and Reflectionfrom the scope of the prohibition through the detection system and up to the requirements for imposing sanctions on Athletes. Many insights have been gained along the way, many questions asked and proposals made. Inspired by the simple yet striking quote by E.M. Forster, these concluding remarks are

FICE