Titlebook: Events and Grammar; Susan Rothstein Book 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998 grammar.language.Proposition.semantic.semanti

ACRO

书目名称Events and Grammar影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Events and Grammar影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Events and Grammar网络公开度




书目名称Events and Grammar网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Events and Grammar被引频次




书目名称Events and Grammar被引频次学科排名




书目名称Events and Grammar年度引用




书目名称Events and Grammar年度引用学科排名




书目名称Events and Grammar读者反馈




书目名称Events and Grammar读者反馈学科排名

隐藏

Transformatoren (T) (Umspanner),tic theory is one filled with varying conceptions of what these are, if indeed they exist at all.. They have at times been conceived of as purely syntactic objects (e.g. the ‘theta roles’ of Chomsky, 1981; the “case relations” of Fillmore, 1968), as names for parts of lexical/conceptual structure (e

LAITY

有说服力

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7863-8account goes some way towards explaining the discourse properties of progressive sentences, and has been adopted by a number of authors, including Moens (1987), Parsons (1990), and Kamp and Reyle (1993). Others, including Smith (1991), have argued against treating the progressive as a stativizer. I

myalgia

,-Messung in kleinen Flüssigkeitsmengen,ollowing Doron’s (1983) terminology), and discuss the implications of this claim for a number of topics dealt with in current theories of genericity. I begin with a background about the distribution of Pron, and make the initial claim about the connection between Pron and genericity. In section 3 an

Ondines-curse

Ondines-curse

Dislocation

Celiac-Plexus

,Elektrische Wellen in der Ionosphäre,The fact that we make reference to events in our language is a well established linguistic fact. Nominals have long been recognised as elements which can refer to events. Vendler (1967) discusses the meanings of derived nominals such as the subject in (1), and shows that it is ambiguous.

Frequency

,Die ersten drahtlosen Übertragungsversuche,The behavior of tenses in future contexts is quite peculiar. When a present tense is under the scope of a future auxiliary (.), the temporal location for events constrained by that tense is shifted forward. Although . in (1) has present tense, the anticipated meeting events follow the utterance time.