找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering; 17th International C Hermann Kaindl,Mike Mannion,Leszek A. Maciaszek Conference pro

[复制链接]
查看: 43858|回复: 57
发表于 2025-3-21 19:20:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering
副标题17th International C
编辑Hermann Kaindl,Mike Mannion,Leszek A. Maciaszek
视频video
丛书名称Communications in Computer and Information Science
图书封面Titlebook: Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering; 17th International C Hermann Kaindl,Mike Mannion,Leszek A. Maciaszek Conference pro
描述This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, ENASE 2022, held Virtually..The 15 full papers included in this book were carefully reviewed and selected from 109 submissions. They were organized in topical sections as follows: Theory and Practice of Systems and Applications Development; Challenges and Novel Approaches to Systems and Software Engineering (SSE); and Systems and Software Quality.
出版日期Conference proceedings 2023
关键词architecting; computer networks; computer programming; computer software maintenance; computer systems; H
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36597-3
isbn_softcover978-3-031-36596-6
isbn_ebook978-3-031-36597-3Series ISSN 1865-0929 Series E-ISSN 1865-0937
issn_series 1865-0929
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering网络公开度




书目名称Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering被引频次




书目名称Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering被引频次学科排名




书目名称Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering年度引用




书目名称Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering年度引用学科排名




书目名称Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering读者反馈




书目名称Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:42:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:57:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:40:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:46:59 | 显示全部楼层
,Biegevorrichtung für kleine Lasten,the projects have a moderate and high number of pairwise conflicts and half have a low number of pairwise conflicts or none. Futhermore, on average 18.82% of the time windows have conflicts. On the other hand, regarding how much the integration process can be improved, . improves the IPE in 94.16% o
发表于 2025-3-22 12:58:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:31:21 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-04773-5and offers increased security via Blockchain and Non-Fungible Tokens. The proposed approach is compared against other known metadata systems utilizing a set of functional properties with very encouraging results.
发表于 2025-3-22 22:48:18 | 显示全部楼层
Ekkehard Grundmann,Christian Wittingisconception of SO rules and culture, and steep learning curve) are responsible behind this difficulty. Moreover, the activeness of regular users is 6.71 times more than the neophytes who face adverse situations. It depicts that facing adverse situations reduces the activeness of neophytes. The stud
发表于 2025-3-23 04:35:49 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-04775-9ysis to study all publicly released versions of the target applications, amounting to over 15 years’ worth of releases for each. We found that a small number of issue types were responsible for most of the debt and observed that refactoring reduced debt levels across most application packages. We ob
发表于 2025-3-23 06:45:42 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-8 09:04
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表