Titlebook: Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering; 6th International Co Leszek A. Maciaszek,Kang Zhang Conference proceedings 2013 Spr

中和

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12091-7omponent-based programming to cope with software complexity, extra-functional properties are playing a more important role. The problem addressed in this paper concerns an insufficient adoption of extra-functional properties into practise that consequently limits approaches to modularised software.

杂色

expound

EVEN

Conference proceedings 2013requirements engineering, programming, software processes and methods, software tools and environments, business process and services modeling, software components, software effort and processes, and socio-technical aspects of software development.

间接

Conference proceedings 2013are Engineering, ENASE 2011, held in Beijing, China, in June 2011. The 18 revised and extended full papers presented together with 10 revised short papers were carefully reviewed and selected from 75 initial submissions. The papers cover a wide range of topics, such as software quality and testing,

exigent

ADORN

Continuous Improvement of Business Processes Realized by Services Based on Execution Measurementand a continuous improvement process to guide the introduction of improvements. We have integrated several different approaches, techniques and methodologies in a single proposal to guide the improvement effort in an organization, providing support for business people from the definition to the analysis of the execution measures defined.

一再困扰

Comparing and Evaluating Existing Software Contract Toolsh to various aspects of software contracts. We present the similarities as well as the areas of significant disagreement and highlight the shortcomings of existing technologies. We briefly introduce ., a software contract tool under development, explaining its approach to various aspects of software contracts.

SMART

Structure Editors: Old Hat or Future Vision?itor for Lisp. The evaluation of the editor’s usability reveals an interesting mismatch. Whereas by far most participants of a questionnaire intuitively favour the structure editor to the textual editor, objective improvements are measurable, yet not significant.

Benzodiazepines