找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences; Proceedings of the F H. Tristram Engelhardt,Stuart F. Spicker Conference proceedings

[复制链接]
楼主: Lipase
发表于 2025-3-23 12:59:13 | 显示全部楼层
Context and Reflexivity: The Genealogy of Selfrked passion; yet searches designed to ferret it out just as often end by entrapping themselves in their own belief and passion. It were wiser perhaps to leave these matters to those more accustomed to the regions of illusion and sly dexterity: the magical crafts.
发表于 2025-3-23 16:36:47 | 显示全部楼层
Comments on “Context and Reflexivity”d). Zaner clearly intends to speak to the issue of this Symposium in pointing out, in the text we just quoted, the role philosophy should play in the biomedical sciences. He is well aware that philosophy does not enter into this role out of a position of strength.
发表于 2025-3-23 19:23:12 | 显示全部楼层
Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical SciencesProceedings of the F
发表于 2025-3-23 23:38:15 | 显示全部楼层
Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences978-94-010-1769-5
发表于 2025-3-24 05:06:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 09:39:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 13:06:58 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02071-3d further, I will argue, unlike many other theses that are wholly unwarranted, it is pernicious, having as its consequence the view that philosophers ought not attempt to do what I claim it is both possible and crucial for them to do. The essence of my response will be quite simple: I grant that phi
发表于 2025-3-24 16:58:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 19:26:40 | 显示全部楼层
Introductiony there have been books published on the logic and philosophy of medicine.. But the formalization of issues and concepts in medicine has not received, at least in this century, sustained interest by professional philosophers. Groups of philosophers have not engaged medicine in order to explicate its
发表于 2025-3-25 02:46:35 | 显示全部楼层
Comments on “Concepts of Function and Mechanism in Medicine and Medical Science” and “Organs, Organiere like .. Here Bernard’s — and Toulmin’s — analysis would stop. Wartofsky, however, would go one step further and say that socio-historical communities of organisms are like .: diseases which for Bernard and Toulmin then are pathologies of “words;” and “sentences” are for Wartofsky principally pat
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-9 14:20
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表