找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups; Eric van Um Book 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016 Terrorism.Explanatory P

[复制链接]
查看: 33369|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 18:43:32 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups
编辑Eric van Um
视频video
概述Study in Political Science.Includes supplementary material:
图书封面Titlebook: Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups;  Eric van Um Book 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016 Terrorism.Explanatory P
描述.This book improves our understanding of terrorists’ motivations and rationality and may, ultimately, also indicate how to respond to the phenomenon of terrorism. In his research studies, Eric van Um explores the political rationality of terrorist groups. The political rationality model builds on rational choice theory. It demands that terrorist groups take into account the costs and benefits of their available options and choose the option promising them the highest political utility. Testing the explanatory power of this model is relevant, as rational choice approaches have become very prominent in terrorism research. But, at the same time, their empirical power remains highly contested. Increased knowledge of the political rationality model not only promises added value for terrorism research itself, but also for social sciences more generally..
出版日期Book 2016
关键词Terrorism; Explanatory Power; Rational Choice Theory; Inter-Group Violence; Terrorist Groups’ Political
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11539-5
isbn_softcover978-3-658-11538-8
isbn_ebook978-3-658-11539-5
copyrightSpringer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups网络公开度




书目名称Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups被引频次




书目名称Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups被引频次学科排名




书目名称Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups年度引用




书目名称Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups年度引用学科排名




书目名称Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups读者反馈




书目名称Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:15:34 | 显示全部楼层
Conceptual Considerations,ittle more than the fact that terrorism is difficult to define. As a consequence, more than 100, if not more than 200, modern definitions of terrorism have been formulated (Easson and Schmid, 2011). These emphasize different aspects of terrorism, such as the underlying motivations, applied tactics,
发表于 2025-3-22 01:54:05 | 显示全部楼层
The Puzzle of Inter-Terrorist Group Violence,losion killed over 200 people, including many members of the terrorist group Palestine Liberation Front (PLF). The attack also destroyed equipment of the PLF, worth millions of dollars. It was widely acknowledged that the bombing had been carried out by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palest
发表于 2025-3-22 07:57:18 | 显示全部楼层
The Puzzle of the Political Ineffectiveness of Terrorist Groups,ared an end to the group’s existence. This was the final act of a campaign of left-wing terrorism which had plagued Germany since the early 1970s. The terror attacks had created fear throughout the country, cost the lives of 34 people, and injured many more (Seils, 2008). The group’s campaign of vio
发表于 2025-3-22 09:32:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:56:08 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0231-3is research has provided us with novel insights into many of the political, economic, social, and legal aspects and characteristics of terrorism. Other aspects, including the ever disputed definition of terrorism, have remained vague or unclear. The “rationality” of terrorists’ behavior also remains
发表于 2025-3-22 20:24:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:58:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:39:53 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93827-7ared an end to the group’s existence. This was the final act of a campaign of left-wing terrorism which had plagued Germany since the early 1970s. The terror attacks had created fear throughout the country, cost the lives of 34 people, and injured many more (Seils, 2008). The group’s campaign of vio
发表于 2025-3-23 09:22:45 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-15 03:27
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表