找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Evaluating the Language of Argument; Martin Hinton Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Argument Semantics.Fallacies of Language.

[复制链接]
楼主: Chylomicron
发表于 2025-3-25 03:20:51 | 显示全部楼层
Martin HintonExplores the relationship between language and argumentation.Introduces informal argument semantics to the study of arguments.Features examples of the technique at work and its advantages
发表于 2025-3-25 10:15:14 | 显示全部楼层
Argumentation Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/317261.jpg
发表于 2025-3-25 15:33:37 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61694-6Argument Semantics; Fallacies of Language; Linguistic Approaches to Argumentation; Nature of Language; N
发表于 2025-3-25 18:19:02 | 显示全部楼层
The Meaning of Meaningers of language spend the better part of their time on this very question. At the same time, the simplest man can use language and he knows just exactly what he means by the things that he says. In order to make some sense of this apparent paradox, it will be necessary to tread gingerly into the coo
发表于 2025-3-25 22:24:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 03:42:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 04:43:14 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 10:30:35 | 显示全部楼层
Linguistic Fallacies in Philosophyof argumentational discourse. Even those who are determined to be rational and have a strong understanding of the laws of inference; those who have their emotions in check, and their prejudices well-disguised; those who would seek out the truth from no other motive than a love of knowledge and wisdo
发表于 2025-3-26 12:49:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 19:41:58 | 显示全部楼层
Fallaciesindividually, and the case made as to why the argument should not be admitted, without reference to any standard patterns of rejected structures, the field would be in a sorry state. The good and the bad must be separated with regards to something, and it is rather easier to recognise and employ patterns of bad argument than good.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-2 01:03
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表