找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Evaluating New Technologies; Methodological Probl Paul Sollie,Marcus Düwell Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Ethical Tec

[复制链接]
楼主: 我赞成
发表于 2025-3-26 21:00:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 05:03:38 | 显示全部楼层
The Moral Relevance of Technological Artifactsnt, and it analyzes the ethical dimensions of technology itself. First, the chapter addresses the question of how to conceptualize and assess the moral significance of technological artifacts. If technologies help to shape moral actions and decisions, how to understand and evaluate this moral role o
发表于 2025-3-27 05:53:52 | 显示全部楼层
Interdisciplinarity, Applied Ethics and Social Scienceicists working together, but also by an increasing attention, from both sides, to the very nature of their cooperation. The debate on this topic has been ongoing for more than twenty years, but in the last years the discussion became more intense. However, one can doubt whether up until now the rele
发表于 2025-3-27 09:36:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 17:25:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 21:48:14 | 显示全部楼层
On Uncertainty in Ethics and Technologyinty is a pivotal feature of complex technologies, its importance has not yet been fully appreciated within the field of ethics. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to study uncertainty in technology development and its consequences for ethics. Going on the insight of other scientific disciplines su
发表于 2025-3-27 22:07:48 | 显示全部楼层
New Technologies, Common Sense and the Paradoxical Precautionary Principlef the PP may be suitable, but are not importantly different from Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA). Strong versions of the PP are importantly distinct from CBA but are not a suitable basis for regulation because they lead to paradoxical outcomes if applied consistently. I consider three different lines of
发表于 2025-3-28 03:22:20 | 显示全部楼层
Complex Technology, Complex Calculations: Uses and Abuses of Precautionary Reasoning in Lawscue the precautionary principle as such. However, it is argued, using Pascal’s Wager, that there are conditions under which precautionary reasoning is valid, which provides a general principle for the limiting case. Although the limiting principle does not apply straightforwardly to the principle t
发表于 2025-3-28 06:44:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 13:54:02 | 显示全部楼层
978-90-481-8477-4Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-7-2 20:08
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表