找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Euthanasia is Not the Answer; A Hospice Physician’ David Cundiff Book 1992 The Humana Press inc. 1992 AIDS.cancer.care.death.euthanasia.hea

[复制链接]
查看: 11303|回复: 47
发表于 2025-3-21 19:06:46 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Euthanasia is Not the Answer
副标题A Hospice Physician’
编辑David Cundiff
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Euthanasia is Not the Answer; A Hospice Physician’ David Cundiff Book 1992 The Humana Press inc. 1992 AIDS.cancer.care.death.euthanasia.hea
描述Instances of euthanasia or mercy killing date back to antiquity. However, it is only recently that the unprecedented grassroots efforts to legalize euthana­ sia have begun building. "Terminal Illness, Assistance with Dying," a California ballot initiative for the No­ vember 1992 election, might for the first time in modem history legalize euthanasia and assisted suicide by physicians. Similar initiatives are planned in other states. To vote intelligently, citizens in California and throughout the United States need to learn who is likely to request euthanasia or assisted suicide, and why. How we care for the terminally ill eventually af­ fects us all. In over half of all deaths, a chronic dis­ ease process such as cancer or congestive heart failure leads to a terminal phase that may last for days, weeks, or months. Most people are more afraid of the suffering associated with this terminal phase than they are afraid of dying itself. When polled, most Americans tell us they would prefer to die at home, surrounded by loved ones, rather than in a hospital receiving high-tech tests and treatments until the last. Yet the majority of people, even those with term­ inal illnesses, die in th
出版日期Book 1992
关键词AIDS; cancer; care; death; euthanasia; health; health care; intelligence; medicine; oncology; pain; patients; qu
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0415-2
isbn_softcover978-1-4612-6752-2
isbn_ebook978-1-4612-0415-2
copyrightThe Humana Press inc. 1992
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Euthanasia is Not the Answer影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Euthanasia is Not the Answer影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Euthanasia is Not the Answer网络公开度




书目名称Euthanasia is Not the Answer网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Euthanasia is Not the Answer被引频次




书目名称Euthanasia is Not the Answer被引频次学科排名




书目名称Euthanasia is Not the Answer年度引用




书目名称Euthanasia is Not the Answer年度引用学科排名




书目名称Euthanasia is Not the Answer读者反馈




书目名称Euthanasia is Not the Answer读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:19:47 | 显示全部楼层
is terminal phase than they are afraid of dying itself. When polled, most Americans tell us they would prefer to die at home, surrounded by loved ones, rather than in a hospital receiving high-tech tests and treatments until the last. Yet the majority of people, even those with term­ inal illnesses, die in th978-1-4612-6752-2978-1-4612-0415-2
发表于 2025-3-22 00:35:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:11:14 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 11:47:38 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14705-2Mr. Lee (not his real name) was a 52-year-old Korean man who had undergone surgery for stomach cancer 13 months earlier. Since the cancer had already spread to the liver and elsewhere, he had been given intraoperative chemotherapy followed by conventional outpatient chemotherapy.
发表于 2025-3-22 13:41:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:29:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:03:23 | 显示全部楼层
Western Europe’s Energy OutlookIn my view the main argument against legalizing active euthanasia is that hospice care is a far preferable alternative. In the following I will present a synopsis of the classical arguments against euthanasia for completeness, and because some offer valid related points.
发表于 2025-3-23 04:19:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:41:14 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06327-7Treatment for the pain and suffering of the terminally ill today is intolerably poor. I don’t blame euthanasia proponents for proposing a remedy. But it’s the wrong remedy!
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-19 06:27
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表