Titlebook: European Factor Mobility; Trends and Consequen Ian Gordon (Professor of Geography, Lecturer in th Book 1989 Ian Gordon and A. P. Thirlwall

barium-study

needle

Theoretical and Empirical Determinants of International Labour Mobility: A Greek-German Perspective over the years scattered throughout the world either as tradesmen, or restaurant owners, as industry workers or shipowners. It has been said that Greece’s comparative advantage lies ‘in exporting its people’.

油膏

A Counterfactual Study of Economic Impacts of Norwegian Emigration and Capital Imports,th century and the early parts of this century, a large share of the Norwegian population (and labour force) migrated overseas. In Europe, only Ireland had higher emigration rates. From the 1890s up to the First World War, capital imports covered a fairly large part of gross domestic investment, and

debunk

Illegal Immigrants and the Informal Economy in Italy,lear labour importer.. The changes involve not only the size but also the nature of this flow. Whereas, in the past, both Italians working abroad and the few foreigners working in Italy did so quite legally, the recent flow of immigrants to Italy has been marked by a high percentage working illegall

capsule

EXULT

,Europe’s Long-term Capital Flows Since 1971, on a massive scale throughout the nineteenth century (Bairoch, 1976). In the first decade of the twentieth century its annual investments overseas even exceeded those at home (Green and Urquhart, 1976), something that no other country has ever done.. Germany and France were also important sources o

假设

Restrictions on International Capital Flows: The Case of Italy,istrative controls is described in Section 2. Section 3 presents some evidence on the Italian economy’s financial openness and integration with foreign financial markets; it also identifies certain broad effects of controls on the structure of foreign capital flows. Sections 4 and 5 discuss the purp

bourgeois

冲突

Legend

Kritische Bewertung des erreichten Standes,.5) Norway has financed a larger part of its gross domestic capital formation by capital imports. In fact, Canada and Australia had even higher shares of foreign financing but, as Marris (1985) notes, these countries share with Norway the characteristics of sparse population and large unexploited natural resources.