Titlebook: Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman; Western and Buddhist Gordon F. Davis Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Spr

温和女孩

,Altruism in the Charnel Ground: Śāntideva and Parfit on Anātman, Reductionism and Benevolence, that claims normative implications do not follow from Parfit’s reductionism. This objection, I argue, also applies to Śāntideva. Although her argument is probably effective against Parfit, in the final section I explain how Buddhist claims about impermanence and suffering provide a response to Wolf

Cantankerous

,Variations on Anātman: Buddhist Themes in Deep Ecology and in Future-Directed Environmental Ethics,environmental ethics are versions of deep ecology. We sketch a style of environmental ethics that seems to follow from the consequentialist approach of two major contemporary Buddhist philosophers, Mark Siderits and Charles Goodman; we call this approach ‘future-directed’ ecology, to contrast it wit

铁砧

Construction of invariant measures,th an overview of the various perspectives presented by the other contributors to this volume, and some common threads running through different segments of the volume; for example, some perspectives favour reductionist accounts of selfhood, while some favour non-reductionist accounts, and this diff

antidepressant

危险

小争吵

objections to my claim that Sextus and Nāgārjuna represent a distinct category of religiosity, I end with reflections on what the study of Sextus and Nāgārjuna could add to contemporary philosophy of religion.

Banister

conference

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14399-1ates one from suffering, for Kant the aim is an agency free of the conceit that interferes with clear moral vision, sound judgement, and dutiful action.  I conclude by responding to objections advanced by Charles Goodman which aim to show that the Kantian position is deeply at odds with Buddhist thi

ornithology

使闭塞

Beginning the Search for Answers,of the self as a single entity but nonetheless affirms the value of assertive will to power, an ideal that is the opposite of Buddhist selflessness. An exploration of these themes through a comparative focus on Heidegger and . helps to identify various senses in which the self could be said to “be”