找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Ethical Issues in Behavioral Neuroscience; Grace Lee,Judy Illes,Frauke Ohl Book 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 Behavior.Ethic

[复制链接]
楼主: ARSON
发表于 2025-3-25 04:13:16 | 显示全部楼层
New Insights into Lynch Syndrome Diagnosis,sponsibly started, and once started adequately protect the interests of participants. We conclude with recommendations that industry sponsors of clinical trials should adopt in order to advance a collective and patient-centered research ethic.
发表于 2025-3-25 08:52:10 | 显示全部楼层
Would the Elimination of the Capacity to Suffer Solve Ethical Dilemmas in Experimental Animal Reseaecent knockout experiments suggest that we already have, or are very close to having, the capacity to reduce suffering in laboratories via genetic engineering. If we are truly committed to balancing the advancement of science with the welfare of animals, this option should be further explored.
发表于 2025-3-25 13:37:11 | 显示全部楼层
How Does Enhancing Cognition Affect Human Values? How Does This Translate into Social Responsibilitlikely to be undertaken. This paper explores the way values affect and are affected by enhancing cognitive abilities. Furthermore, it argues that knowledge of the interplay between values and cognitive enhancement makes a strong case for social responsibility around cognitive enhancement practices.
发表于 2025-3-25 16:01:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 21:13:30 | 显示全部楼层
Externalization of Consciousness. Scientific Possibilities and Clinical Implications,ormed consent. Against this background, we argue for the necessity of further scientific efforts and ethical reflection in neurotechnological assessment of consciousness and ‘cerebral communication’ with verbally non-communicative patients.
发表于 2025-3-26 00:21:50 | 显示全部楼层
Definition of the Diana operations, within what we argue is the mainstream framework for research animal ethics, namely one based on harm–benefit analysis. We explore issues of harms and benefits and how to balance them as well as how to reduce harm and increase benefit within neuroscience research.
发表于 2025-3-26 06:19:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 09:05:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 14:07:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 17:50:35 | 显示全部楼层
Does the Goal Justify the Methods? Harm and Benefit in Neuroscience Research Using Animals, within what we argue is the mainstream framework for research animal ethics, namely one based on harm–benefit analysis. We explore issues of harms and benefits and how to balance them as well as how to reduce harm and increase benefit within neuroscience research.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-25 20:30
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表