| 书目名称 | Essays on the Historicity of Capital | | 编辑 | Alain Herscovici | | 视频video | | | 概述 | Studies the heterogeneity of capital through examining the work of Ricardo, Keynes, and Stiglitz.Argues against the traditional opposition between neo-Ricardian and post-Keynesian approaches.Includes | | 图书封面 |  | | 描述 | The methodological and epistemological problem this book studies is related to the heterogeneity of capital. Capitals are heterogeneous through time and space; at the same time, various heterogeneous capitals must be aggregated, as shown by Ricardo and Keynes. On the other hand, the value of some quantity of aggregate capital changes over time, as demonstrated by Ricardo, Keynes and Stiglitz. For this purpose, this book considers Ricardo, Keynes and Stiglitz. For each author, capital is heterogeneous: Ricardo, from his labor theory; Keynes from the change in expectations, in regard to the return of such capital; and Stiglitz from the divergences between the different groups’ expectations. .Ricardo was the first author who explained why the value of capital cannot be determined independently from distribution variables and consequently why such value changes when distribution variables change — this mechanism was deepened by Sraffa and the neo-Ricardian school. Keynes, with the concept of supply price of capital, explains why such value moves in regard to long-term expectations. Finally, Stiglitz’s analysis is a complementary approach in regard to Keynes’s, insofar as he details th | | 出版日期 | Book 2019 | | 关键词 | capital; epistemology; ricardo; keynes; sraffa; stieglitz; determinism; Lakatos; Cambridge controversy; Infor | | 版次 | 1 | | doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14838-6 | | isbn_ebook | 978-3-030-14838-6 | | copyright | The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl |
The information of publication is updating
|
|
发表于 2025-3-21 19:43:35
