Titlebook: Essays on Restrictiveness and Learnability; Howard Lasnik Book 1990 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1990 Index.Noam Chomsky.gram

chastise

R. E. Just,E. Lichtenberg,D. Zilberman general agreement that restrictiveness is important. There is substantial controversy, however, over exactly what ought to be restricted and over the nature of the appropriate restrictions. I will explore the question of what has to be learned by the child and the implications for restrictiveness p

言外之意

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3354-8heories make a variety of parameters available within universal grammar. It will be the purpose of the present paper to explore the nature of certain of these parameters with the goal of determining how it is possible for the language learner to ‘fix’ them. In the course of the discussion, it will b

整体

H. C. Spratt,G. A. Ahronheim,M. I. Marksle schema (e.g. “move .”), conditions on rules (e.g. the recoverability condition for deletions), and filters (e.g. *[. [. e]]) — all of which provide a severely limited set of possible grammars from which certain properties of language follow.. The contents of the grammar are organized into various

jabber

FANG

Biliary Manometry and Debimetry,roperly governed. Attention has particularly focused on the ECP as a constraint on the representations resulting from . Movement (see for example Jaeggli (1980a), Chomsky (1981a), Kayne (1981a), Stowell (1981), Huang (1982)). In this article we will address such issues as (a) the definition of “prop

mucous-membrane

小争吵

Grandstand

On Certain Substitutes for Negative Data,tructures are . part of the language — then Universal Grammar presumably does not make available choices that can only by resolved by such evidence. (See Chomsky and Lasnik (1977) for early discussion.) In principle, the concern is exclusively with the situation schematized in (1).

轻触

Commodity Market Trading and Investmentre assuming. in Lasnik and Fiengo (1974) imposes overly restrictive formal criteria. Since such an argument implies that the class of possible grammars must be increased, the burden of proof clearly rests on its proponent. We maintain that Postal has failed in this task.

小歌剧