Titlebook: Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics; Stefania Centrone Book 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017 Edmund Huss

antihistamine

书目名称Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics网络公开度




书目名称Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics被引频次




书目名称Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics被引频次学科排名




书目名称Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics年度引用




书目名称Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics年度引用学科排名




书目名称Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics读者反馈




书目名称Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics读者反馈学科排名

glans-penis

Husserl and His Alter Ego Kant,anism for the title of transcendental philosophy. Some issues that Husserl is concerned with in Kant are bound up with the works of Lambert. Kant believed that the role played by principles of sensibility in metaphysics should be determined by a “general phenomenology” on which Lambert had written.

mitral-valve

Exhilarate

Husserl and Boole, and discussed in the work of early Husserl, focusing in particular on Husserl’s lecture “.” of 1895, in which an entire section is devoted to Boole. We confront Husserl’s representation of the problem-solving processes with the analysis of “symbolic reasoning” proposed by George Boole in the . (185

Volatile-Oils

Criteria

Criteria

concert

Husserl and Frege on Sense,ed that while the similarities between their views speak in favour of a Fregean interpretation of Husserl’s notion of noematic sense, there are also important differences. With regard to the latter, it is argued that Husserl’s view yields a more general criterion of propositional difference and also

确保

Husserl and Riemann,ematics, as well as on the distinction between sense and referent are either insignificant or, as in the last case, totally inexistent, and that Husserl’s account of Leibniz and Bolzano’s influence in . is correct, we turn to Riemann, whose influence is certainly non-negligible. Husserl’s conception

我悲伤

Husserl and Hilbert,lifelong friendship. After a brief account of the complementary nature of their early approaches, the paper focuses on Husserl’s . (1929) viewed as a response to Hilbert’s “new foundations” developed in the 1920s. While both Husserl and Hilbert share a “mathematics first,” nonrevisionist approach to