找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Essays on Argumentation in Antiquity; Joseph Andrew Bjelde,David Merry,Christopher Roser Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Arg

[复制链接]
楼主: 可怖
发表于 2025-3-23 12:14:03 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70817-7Argumentation Ancient Philosophy; Ancient Rhetoric; Ancient Logic; Dialectic Ancient Philosophy; Rhetori
发表于 2025-3-23 17:38:55 | 显示全部楼层
Joseph Andrew Bjelde,David Merry,Christopher RoserCovers a broad range of ancient perspectives on argumentation.Combines approaches from argumentation theory and history of philosophy.Is an excellent resource on how ancient thinkers argue and think a
发表于 2025-3-23 18:05:35 | 显示全部楼层
Argumentation Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/315297.jpg
发表于 2025-3-24 00:13:20 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 05:15:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 08:24:58 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49532-3 instructing us—I turn to the historical Gorgias. The ‘Encomium of Helen’ ascribes to . (speech) virtually all-powerful capacities for persuasion, seduction, and even bewitchment. Here Gorgias (seemingly) celebrates the very things Plato rejects. Yet in the ‘Defense of Palamedes’ considerable anxiet
发表于 2025-3-24 11:28:16 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65640-9bouts is then given and their meaning explained. The transition from oral to written arguments is briefly examined, leading to the formulation of a delimitation problem in Plato’s dialogues, as he inserted dialectical arguments within ordinary dialogue contexts, turning them into discussions where o
发表于 2025-3-24 17:14:30 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780312299613e clear: the dialectical use of arguments is epistemically valuable, while the rhetorical use is epistemically deficient. What is less clear, however, is how Plato justifies this sharp contrast. In this paper, I consider seven different ways scholarship has tried to answer this question. I argue tha
发表于 2025-3-24 21:55:05 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 02:59:06 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70246-5at the success of the Socratic inquiry depends on the character of his interlocutors and their sense of what is shameful or not. To read the . is to inquire whether Socrates’ refutations have demonstrated anything. Although there is no definition of justice, happiness or the art of rhetoric, the dia
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-2 10:24
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表